Reviews of Shot At Home Movies (130 - page 3)
Emma and Brad 4 review summaries:
astroknight's
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 8/16/2005:
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
(3.5 stars from 1 review)
Starring: Tom, Grace (ambiguous)
Studio: Shot At Home
Release date: 8/15/2005
Grace & Tom 2: Grace's Anal Video review summaries:
astroknight's
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 8/15/2005:
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
Wife Swap: Shakina and Bev (Shot at Home) review summaries:
astroknight's
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 7/28/2005:
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
Real Office Slut 1: Misty & Rick review summaries:
Darth Morpheous'
This was my first time trying to watch a real amateur video. The thought of watching a true couple having hot sex is a recipe for success alone. Unfortunately for guys like me, who are so used to watching drop dead gorgeous taking foot long cocks in there ass, gaping wide open, doing A2Ms galore, taking loads to the face without blinking, and all the other hardcore stuff, it's hard to watch a amateur flick that is tame compared to the hardcore stuff. Many times on adultdvdtalk.com I have heard good things about Shot at home. I didn't think I would be able to get into the amateur stuff. Boy was I wrong! I went on the site to see what it was all about. I checked out the anal flicks and noticed Misty. She is a hot brunette that does anal in most of her scenes. Andy from Shot at home, provides an amazing description of every one of there movies. I noticed that Misty seemed to be a pretty hardcore girl. She like anal play with dildos and takes it in the ass. I even noticed some A2M in her scenes from the descriptions and I decided to give it a shot. The DVD starts in Misty's bedroom. [read the full review]
review from 7/11/2006:
This was my first time trying to watch a real amateur video. The thought of watching a true couple having hot sex is a recipe for success alone. Unfortunately for guys like me, who are so used to watching drop dead gorgeous taking foot long cocks in there ass, gaping wide open, doing A2Ms galore, taking loads to the face without blinking, and all the other hardcore stuff, it's hard to watch a amateur flick that is tame compared to the hardcore stuff. Many times on adultdvdtalk.com I have heard good things about Shot at home. I didn't think I would be able to get into the amateur stuff. Boy was I wrong! I went on the site to see what it was all about. I checked out the anal flicks and noticed Misty. She is a hot brunette that does anal in most of her scenes. Andy from Shot at home, provides an amazing description of every one of there movies. I noticed that Misty seemed to be a pretty hardcore girl. She like anal play with dildos and takes it in the ass. I even noticed some A2M in her scenes from the descriptions and I decided to give it a shot. The DVD starts in Misty's bedroom. [read the full review]
Sarah and Jay 1 review summaries:
astroknight's
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 2/28/2005:
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
Selena Silver at Home review summaries:
Silent Jay's
When I First Heard This Was Coming Out I Was Very Excited For Two Reasons #1. I'm a Selena Silver Fan #2. I'm a Mtv Cribs Fan and This DVD Has The Perfect Blend of Those Two Elements. I Think Shot at Home Has a Real Good Idea and I Hope More Stars Participate The MovieWe Start Off With Selena Lying on the Floor Masturbating (Fingers Only)Talking Dirty to us in a Soft, Sentual Voice. Very Nice Camera Work Here Great Close-up on Selena It Ends With Selena Having a Orgasm What a Great Way To Start The Movie..We Cut To Selena Sitting Down Wearing Pink Pajama Bottoms and a White TankTop and Here She Giving Us an Introduction to Herself and Discusses Being Hesitant at First About Doing This New Series From Shot at Home Because It's a Very Personal Thing to Invite Someone Into Your Home But Then She Thought it and She Said Sure I Like To Be Upfront With The Fans So Here We Are Selena Silver at Home.The Living Room So We Start The Tour of The House in The Living Room and It's Amazing..Hardwood Floors, Large Windows, Nice Furniture and a Nice Bar Basicaly Everything My Pad is Not LOL. [read the full review]
review from 6/29/2004:
When I First Heard This Was Coming Out I Was Very Excited For Two Reasons #1. I'm a Selena Silver Fan #2. I'm a Mtv Cribs Fan and This DVD Has The Perfect Blend of Those Two Elements. I Think Shot at Home Has a Real Good Idea and I Hope More Stars Participate The MovieWe Start Off With Selena Lying on the Floor Masturbating (Fingers Only)Talking Dirty to us in a Soft, Sentual Voice. Very Nice Camera Work Here Great Close-up on Selena It Ends With Selena Having a Orgasm What a Great Way To Start The Movie..We Cut To Selena Sitting Down Wearing Pink Pajama Bottoms and a White TankTop and Here She Giving Us an Introduction to Herself and Discusses Being Hesitant at First About Doing This New Series From Shot at Home Because It's a Very Personal Thing to Invite Someone Into Your Home But Then She Thought it and She Said Sure I Like To Be Upfront With The Fans So Here We Are Selena Silver at Home.The Living Room So We Start The Tour of The House in The Living Room and It's Amazing..Hardwood Floors, Large Windows, Nice Furniture and a Nice Bar Basicaly Everything My Pad is Not LOL. [read the full review]
bono-ONE's
I was quite intrigued when I received this title in the mail. I'm not one normally to go for amateur type porn but as this dvd concerns Selena Silver I gladly made the exception. Now as this is not a typical porn dvd you can't expect the sound, video, and other technical aspects to be the quality of say an Evil Angel dvd. What I expect, though, is for a more genuine feel that you get if one would shoot with your own camcorder so my audio rating will be based on that. On a personal note I do know Selena a bit through her posts on Adultdvdtalk.com as well as having met her in person a few times most recently at the 2004 Erotica LA show and most memorably at the party DVSX hosted while I was there!! Back to this dvd which gets off to a nice start with Selena masturbating at one of her favorite spots in the house and the camera gives good shots of Miss Silver pleasuring her body. That should get your motor nice 'n' warm but next we tone it down a bit as Selena gives us a tour of her home. [read the full review]
review from 6/26/2004:
I was quite intrigued when I received this title in the mail. I'm not one normally to go for amateur type porn but as this dvd concerns Selena Silver I gladly made the exception. Now as this is not a typical porn dvd you can't expect the sound, video, and other technical aspects to be the quality of say an Evil Angel dvd. What I expect, though, is for a more genuine feel that you get if one would shoot with your own camcorder so my audio rating will be based on that. On a personal note I do know Selena a bit through her posts on Adultdvdtalk.com as well as having met her in person a few times most recently at the 2004 Erotica LA show and most memorably at the party DVSX hosted while I was there!! Back to this dvd which gets off to a nice start with Selena masturbating at one of her favorite spots in the house and the camera gives good shots of Miss Silver pleasuring her body. That should get your motor nice 'n' warm but next we tone it down a bit as Selena gives us a tour of her home. [read the full review]
astroknight's
NOTE: This is a homemade amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 6/23/2004:
NOTE: This is a homemade amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
Emma and Brad 2 review summaries:
astroknight's
The Little Details Running Time: 71 min. Production Date: 11 / 22 / 2003 Director: None credited Cast: Emma and Brad The Short Story Initial Expectations: I really enjoyed Emma at Home, and am looking forward to more from her! Initial Reaction: It has a few minor problems, but is still nicely enjoyable. Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting chemistry and reality Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting nastier sex or top notch technical aspects The Technical Stuff Audio /Video Quality: Shot at Homes movies are homemade videos, and I hesitate to compare them on the same scale as studio porn. Homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely have close to the same quality. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn. [read the full review]
review from 3/5/2004:
The Little Details Running Time: 71 min. Production Date: 11 / 22 / 2003 Director: None credited Cast: Emma and Brad The Short Story Initial Expectations: I really enjoyed Emma at Home, and am looking forward to more from her! Initial Reaction: It has a few minor problems, but is still nicely enjoyable. Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting chemistry and reality Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting nastier sex or top notch technical aspects The Technical Stuff Audio /Video Quality: Shot at Homes movies are homemade videos, and I hesitate to compare them on the same scale as studio porn. Homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely have close to the same quality. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn. [read the full review]
Emma At Home 1 review summaries:
astroknight's
The Little Details Running Time: 68 min. Production Date: 11 / 22 / 2003 Director: None listed Cast: Emma The Short Story Initial Expectations: I really enjoyed Kelli at Home, as well as most everything else Ive seen from Shot at Home, so Im going into this one with high expectations. Initial Reaction: Its another very nice release from Shot at Home. Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting an all girl movie focusing on one woman and who isnt bothered by her actually having a personality Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting only sex or a lot of toys The Technical Stuff Audio /Video Quality: Shot at Homes movies are homemade videos, and I hesitate to compare them on the same scale as studio porn. Homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely have close to the same quality. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn. [read the full review]
review from 3/5/2004:
The Little Details Running Time: 68 min. Production Date: 11 / 22 / 2003 Director: None listed Cast: Emma The Short Story Initial Expectations: I really enjoyed Kelli at Home, as well as most everything else Ive seen from Shot at Home, so Im going into this one with high expectations. Initial Reaction: Its another very nice release from Shot at Home. Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting an all girl movie focusing on one woman and who isnt bothered by her actually having a personality Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting only sex or a lot of toys The Technical Stuff Audio /Video Quality: Shot at Homes movies are homemade videos, and I hesitate to compare them on the same scale as studio porn. Homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely have close to the same quality. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn. [read the full review]
Kelli At Home 1 review summaries:
astroknight's
The Little Details Running Time: 65 min. Production Date: 10 / 25 / 2003 Director: None listed Cast: Kelli Anderson The Short Story Initial Expectations: Ive really enjoyed almost everything Ive seen from Shot at Home. Theyre one of the handful of studios whose features I always go into with very high expectations. Initial Reaction: Go buy this one and then come back to read about it! Who Should Watch It : Fans of girls home alone! Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting to just watch a girl diddle herself the entire time The Technical Stuff Audio /Video Quality: Even when compared to studio porn, the technical aspects here are nicely done for almost the entire movie. Normally I dont expect homemade porn to have nearly this kind of quality for technical aspects just because theyre homemade and dont have the budget or resources that studio porn does. I try not to compare the two because of it, but this one is good enough to compare. Theyre easily the best Ive seen out of any homemade video. [read the full review]
review from 2/21/2004:
The Little Details Running Time: 65 min. Production Date: 10 / 25 / 2003 Director: None listed Cast: Kelli Anderson The Short Story Initial Expectations: Ive really enjoyed almost everything Ive seen from Shot at Home. Theyre one of the handful of studios whose features I always go into with very high expectations. Initial Reaction: Go buy this one and then come back to read about it! Who Should Watch It : Fans of girls home alone! Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting to just watch a girl diddle herself the entire time The Technical Stuff Audio /Video Quality: Even when compared to studio porn, the technical aspects here are nicely done for almost the entire movie. Normally I dont expect homemade porn to have nearly this kind of quality for technical aspects just because theyre homemade and dont have the budget or resources that studio porn does. I try not to compare the two because of it, but this one is good enough to compare. Theyre easily the best Ive seen out of any homemade video. [read the full review]
(4.0 stars from 1 review)
Starring: Claire James, Britney Madison, Suzette
Studio: Shot At Home
Release date: 3/4/2004
Pump Friction 1 (Shot at Home) review summaries:
astroknight's
The Little Details Running Time: 60 min. Production Date: 12 / 20 / 2003 Director: None credited Cast: Britney Madison, Claire James, Suzette (also known as Nadia), and up to three guys The Short Story Initial Expectations: Shot at Home has impressed me with most of their features. I always go into their DVDs with high expectations. Initial Reaction: Its hands down (and up and down and up and down) the best handjob features Ive seen. Who Should Watch It : Anybody whos a fan of handjobs Who Should Avoid It: Anybody who wants to see only handjobs without any of the other body parts helping The Technical Stuff Audio /Video Quality: Shot at Homes movies are homemade videos, and I hesitate to compare them on the same scale as studio porn. Homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely have close to the same quality. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn. [read the full review]
review from 2/23/2004:
The Little Details Running Time: 60 min. Production Date: 12 / 20 / 2003 Director: None credited Cast: Britney Madison, Claire James, Suzette (also known as Nadia), and up to three guys The Short Story Initial Expectations: Shot at Home has impressed me with most of their features. I always go into their DVDs with high expectations. Initial Reaction: Its hands down (and up and down and up and down) the best handjob features Ive seen. Who Should Watch It : Anybody whos a fan of handjobs Who Should Avoid It: Anybody who wants to see only handjobs without any of the other body parts helping The Technical Stuff Audio /Video Quality: Shot at Homes movies are homemade videos, and I hesitate to compare them on the same scale as studio porn. Homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely have close to the same quality. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn. [read the full review]
(4.5 stars from 1 review)
Starring: Megan [I] (ambiguous)
Studio: Shot At Home
Release date: 1/6/2004
Megan Video Letters to Alaska 5 review summaries:
astroknight's
This is yet another great addition to Shot at Home's Megan: Video Letters to Alaska series. Although there's no way I'd recommend this one to somebody who's just starting the series (it just builds too much on itself as it goes), for anybody who's enjoyed the series already this episode starts to feel like Megan's reaching the end of her journey. There's a couple very nice solo scenes here as well as a bit of shaving, and Megan handles the tripod camera work very well. The technical aspects are decently done for an amateur release, and there's also a bit of effort put into the extras. This is yet another Shot at Home winner! [read the full review]
review from 4/17/2008:
This is yet another great addition to Shot at Home's Megan: Video Letters to Alaska series. Although there's no way I'd recommend this one to somebody who's just starting the series (it just builds too much on itself as it goes), for anybody who's enjoyed the series already this episode starts to feel like Megan's reaching the end of her journey. There's a couple very nice solo scenes here as well as a bit of shaving, and Megan handles the tripod camera work very well. The technical aspects are decently done for an amateur release, and there's also a bit of effort put into the extras. This is yet another Shot at Home winner! [read the full review]
Shelly 1 review summaries:
astroknight's
Running Time: 72 min. Date of Release: Sept. 23, 2003 Director: None listed Cast: Shelly and Mike Initial Expectations: Although I have yet to be disappointed by a Shot at Home feature, Im really looking forward to this one! Initial Reaction: Its pretty good, but has a few major faults for my tastes Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting nicely done home movie style amateur action Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting more extreme sex or fairly consistent technical aspects Audio /Video Quality: The technical aspects lack a little when compared to the big picture, but for amateur style porn theyre really impressive. The audio is well balanced, but the level does change very noticeably from the older footage to the newer footage. The video is also very impressive. The older footage looks noticeably older, but still looks very good. There are a few static lines, but Id say that the footage here looks as good as a lot of porn from the early nineties thats been done in studios. [read the full review]
review from 10/12/2003:
Running Time: 72 min. Date of Release: Sept. 23, 2003 Director: None listed Cast: Shelly and Mike Initial Expectations: Although I have yet to be disappointed by a Shot at Home feature, Im really looking forward to this one! Initial Reaction: Its pretty good, but has a few major faults for my tastes Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting nicely done home movie style amateur action Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting more extreme sex or fairly consistent technical aspects Audio /Video Quality: The technical aspects lack a little when compared to the big picture, but for amateur style porn theyre really impressive. The audio is well balanced, but the level does change very noticeably from the older footage to the newer footage. The video is also very impressive. The older footage looks noticeably older, but still looks very good. There are a few static lines, but Id say that the footage here looks as good as a lot of porn from the early nineties thats been done in studios. [read the full review]
Cassandra: Horny Wife To Be 2 review summaries:
astroknight's
Running Time: 68 min. Date of Release: Aug. 23, 2003 Director: None listed Cast: Cassandra and Keith Initial Expectations: I have yet to be disappointed from Shot at Home, even with high expectations. Ive got high expectations here once again! Initial Reaction: It feels really nice, but the technical aspects hold it back a lot in some parts. Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting sex that actually feels like something Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting consistent or high technical aspects or who doesnt like a lot of blowjobs Audio /Video Quality: As usual with homemade videos, the technical aspects are a little lacking. The audio is slightly uneven, but there arent many background noises. The closest thing to a problem with the audio is the soft hum that was probably the camera running. [read the full review]
review from 10/4/2003:
Running Time: 68 min. Date of Release: Aug. 23, 2003 Director: None listed Cast: Cassandra and Keith Initial Expectations: I have yet to be disappointed from Shot at Home, even with high expectations. Ive got high expectations here once again! Initial Reaction: It feels really nice, but the technical aspects hold it back a lot in some parts. Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting sex that actually feels like something Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting consistent or high technical aspects or who doesnt like a lot of blowjobs Audio /Video Quality: As usual with homemade videos, the technical aspects are a little lacking. The audio is slightly uneven, but there arent many background noises. The closest thing to a problem with the audio is the soft hum that was probably the camera running. [read the full review]
(3.0 stars from 1 review)
Starring: David, Lara, Louise, Tab
Studio: Shot At Home
Release date: 6/3/2003
Real Couples' Screen Tests 1 review summaries:
astroknight's
Running Time: 63 min. Production Date: 2003 (although the disclaimer states the scenes were filmed pre - July 3, 1995) Director: None listed Cast: Louise, David, Lara, and Tab Initial Expectations: Ive really liked what Ive seen so far from Shot at Home, so Im going in with high expectations. Initial Reaction: It bounces around the rim a little, but Shot at Home still shoots and scores again! Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting something different for porn but with some real feelings Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting top notch technical aspects or nasty sex Audio /Video Quality: The audio is pretty well balanced, but you still hear background noises like the still camera advancing the film and a few directions from the cameraman. There are also areas where the audio completely disappears. The video is similar. Theres some grain, which varies from scene to scene. The lighting is normally pretty good, but there are a few areas where shadows overtake it or where it flickers a little. [read the full review]
review from 6/26/2003:
Running Time: 63 min. Production Date: 2003 (although the disclaimer states the scenes were filmed pre - July 3, 1995) Director: None listed Cast: Louise, David, Lara, and Tab Initial Expectations: Ive really liked what Ive seen so far from Shot at Home, so Im going in with high expectations. Initial Reaction: It bounces around the rim a little, but Shot at Home still shoots and scores again! Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting something different for porn but with some real feelings Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting top notch technical aspects or nasty sex Audio /Video Quality: The audio is pretty well balanced, but you still hear background noises like the still camera advancing the film and a few directions from the cameraman. There are also areas where the audio completely disappears. The video is similar. Theres some grain, which varies from scene to scene. The lighting is normally pretty good, but there are a few areas where shadows overtake it or where it flickers a little. [read the full review]
(4.0 stars avg from 2 reviews)
Starring: Mischa, Kris Knight, Sascha
Studio: Shot At Home
Release date: 6/3/2003
Real Twins 1 review summaries:
Flash's
Although the audio and video quality of the movie leave something to be desired and a watermark is present on the disc, Real Life Twins Volume 1 is a very fun amateur adult film. The cast is obviously having fun at all times and the lack of structure is a nice break from standard adult films. The sex is on the light side, so viewers that require nasty sex will be disappointed in the sex present and there is no story, so viewers that like a plot with their porn may want to pass on the title. If the title sounds good to you, I'd suggest picking it up, just don't pay too much due to the video quality problems. [read the full review]
review from 11/26/2003:
Although the audio and video quality of the movie leave something to be desired and a watermark is present on the disc, Real Life Twins Volume 1 is a very fun amateur adult film. The cast is obviously having fun at all times and the lack of structure is a nice break from standard adult films. The sex is on the light side, so viewers that require nasty sex will be disappointed in the sex present and there is no story, so viewers that like a plot with their porn may want to pass on the title. If the title sounds good to you, I'd suggest picking it up, just don't pay too much due to the video quality problems. [read the full review]
astroknight's
Running Time: 57 min. Date of Release: Jan. 15, 2001 Director: Not listed (no doubt so people dont hunt him or her down and force them to take them to the twins!) Cast: Sascha. Mischa, Chris Knight, and few other lucky bastards Initial Expectations: Ive enjoyed basically everything Ive seen from Shot at Home. I go into every one of their DVDs with high expectations! Initial Reaction: These twins could doubly my pleasure double my fun any time! Who Should Watch It : Anybody whos had a twin fantasy Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting consistent and high quality technical aspects Audio /Video Quality: The technical aspects are pretty good for amateur porn. The lighting varies from moment to moment, but the audio is normally clear and nicely balanced. Although there are a few remnants and a few flashes of horrible pixelation, most of the video is pretty clear with only a hint of grain. As usual with amateur porn, theres a fair amount of camera shake. [read the full review]
review from 10/4/2003:
Running Time: 57 min. Date of Release: Jan. 15, 2001 Director: Not listed (no doubt so people dont hunt him or her down and force them to take them to the twins!) Cast: Sascha. Mischa, Chris Knight, and few other lucky bastards Initial Expectations: Ive enjoyed basically everything Ive seen from Shot at Home. I go into every one of their DVDs with high expectations! Initial Reaction: These twins could doubly my pleasure double my fun any time! Who Should Watch It : Anybody whos had a twin fantasy Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting consistent and high quality technical aspects Audio /Video Quality: The technical aspects are pretty good for amateur porn. The lighting varies from moment to moment, but the audio is normally clear and nicely balanced. Although there are a few remnants and a few flashes of horrible pixelation, most of the video is pretty clear with only a hint of grain. As usual with amateur porn, theres a fair amount of camera shake. [read the full review]
(4.0 stars avg from 2 reviews)
Starring: Vanessa, Rob
Studio: Shot At Home
Release date: 6/3/2003
Previews: Previews
Outdoor Whores 3: Vanessa review summaries:
Flash's
Despite the poor video quality, More Outdoor Whores Vanessa UK Volume 3 is a fun lighthearted film that is different than most other adult films on the market. Due to the tame sex, this film is perfectly acceptable for couples though viewers looking for a story line, standard adult film sex scenes or nastier acts will want to pass on the film. Due to the poor video quality, I recommend that you don't pay that much for the title so you don't end up disappointed in your purchase. [read the full review]
review from 12/1/2003:
Despite the poor video quality, More Outdoor Whores Vanessa UK Volume 3 is a fun lighthearted film that is different than most other adult films on the market. Due to the tame sex, this film is perfectly acceptable for couples though viewers looking for a story line, standard adult film sex scenes or nastier acts will want to pass on the film. Due to the poor video quality, I recommend that you don't pay that much for the title so you don't end up disappointed in your purchase. [read the full review]
astroknight's
Running Time: 62 min. Date of Release: Jan. 7, 2003 Director: None listed Cast: Vanessa and Rob Initial Expectations: Shot at Home is one of the few studios whos earned high expectations from me with every one of their movies. Initial Reaction: Damn I hope that Shot at Home gets their hands on more of Vanessa!!! Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting passionate sex in the great outdoors Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting high quality and consistent technical aspects Audio /Video Quality: As usual with amateur porn, the technical aspects arent up to the same level as in studio porn. The audio is slightly off balance at times, as the traffic seems a bit louder than the performers at times, but is normally clear and you never have a problem hearing the performers. The video has some slight grain, but its even throughout the movie and there arent any remnants that pop up. There is, however, a few areas with some bad pixelation. [read the full review]
review from 10/12/2003:
Running Time: 62 min. Date of Release: Jan. 7, 2003 Director: None listed Cast: Vanessa and Rob Initial Expectations: Shot at Home is one of the few studios whos earned high expectations from me with every one of their movies. Initial Reaction: Damn I hope that Shot at Home gets their hands on more of Vanessa!!! Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting passionate sex in the great outdoors Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting high quality and consistent technical aspects Audio /Video Quality: As usual with amateur porn, the technical aspects arent up to the same level as in studio porn. The audio is slightly off balance at times, as the traffic seems a bit louder than the performers at times, but is normally clear and you never have a problem hearing the performers. The video has some slight grain, but its even throughout the movie and there arent any remnants that pop up. There is, however, a few areas with some bad pixelation. [read the full review]
(5.0 stars from 1 review)
Starring: Megan [I] (ambiguous)
Studio: Shot At Home
Release date: 6/3/2003
Megan Video Letters to Alaska 1 review summaries:
astroknight's
The Little Details Running Time: 63 min. Production Date: 2 / 1 / 2003 Director: None credited Cast: Megan The Short Story Initial Expectations: This sounds like a different homemade movie. Im really curious about this one. Initial Reaction: Its nothing short of amazing. Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting more emotion than sex Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting a lot of sex The Technical Stuff Audio /Video Quality: The technical aspects feel a little dated. The audio has a bit of a hiss in the background, which I think is the microphone picking up the video camera. Theres a couple minor background noises, but for the most part Megan is easy to hear and understand. The video also feels a little dated. Theres some very minor pixelation, but very little motion since Megan has a very good camera mount that she can adjust by remote control. The lighting is pretty good, and comes across at a very realistic level. [read the full review]
review from 9/5/2005:
The Little Details Running Time: 63 min. Production Date: 2 / 1 / 2003 Director: None credited Cast: Megan The Short Story Initial Expectations: This sounds like a different homemade movie. Im really curious about this one. Initial Reaction: Its nothing short of amazing. Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting more emotion than sex Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting a lot of sex The Technical Stuff Audio /Video Quality: The technical aspects feel a little dated. The audio has a bit of a hiss in the background, which I think is the microphone picking up the video camera. Theres a couple minor background noises, but for the most part Megan is easy to hear and understand. The video also feels a little dated. Theres some very minor pixelation, but very little motion since Megan has a very good camera mount that she can adjust by remote control. The lighting is pretty good, and comes across at a very realistic level. [read the full review]
(5.0 stars from 1 review)
Starring: Megan [I] (ambiguous)
Studio: Shot At Home
Release date: 6/3/2003
Megan Video Letters to Alaska 2 review summaries:
astroknight's
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 3/29/2006:
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
Jessica's Real Anal Deflowering 4 review summaries:
astroknight's
Running Time: 56 min. Production Date: 2003 (although the disclaimer states the scenes were filmed pre - July 3, 1995) Director: None credited Cast: Jessica and the camera guy Initial Expectations: Ive been really impressed with what Ive seen from Shot at Home, and now go into each of their movies with fairly high expectations. Initial Reaction: Its far from perfect technically, but with the reality of everything in the feature I couldnt dislike it. Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting to watch sex that looks and feels real rather than planned out Who Should Avoid It: Anybody who wants very high production values Audio /Video Quality: The technical aspects arent great, but are pretty good for true amateur porn. The audio is clear and nicely balanced, although there are a couple spots where its slightly off. The biggest problem with the audio is that a pocket rocket is used through much of the feature, and most of the time its buzzing is the main thing you hear. The video is a bit more problematic. [read the full review]
review from 7/28/2003:
Running Time: 56 min. Production Date: 2003 (although the disclaimer states the scenes were filmed pre - July 3, 1995) Director: None credited Cast: Jessica and the camera guy Initial Expectations: Ive been really impressed with what Ive seen from Shot at Home, and now go into each of their movies with fairly high expectations. Initial Reaction: Its far from perfect technically, but with the reality of everything in the feature I couldnt dislike it. Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting to watch sex that looks and feels real rather than planned out Who Should Avoid It: Anybody who wants very high production values Audio /Video Quality: The technical aspects arent great, but are pretty good for true amateur porn. The audio is clear and nicely balanced, although there are a couple spots where its slightly off. The biggest problem with the audio is that a pocket rocket is used through much of the feature, and most of the time its buzzing is the main thing you hear. The video is a bit more problematic. [read the full review]
Korin the Sweetest Swede 1 review summaries:
astroknight's
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 2/2/2007:
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
(4.5 stars from 1 review)
Starring: Karen, Amy, Bev, Shakina, Carrissa
Studio: Shot At Home
Release date: 6/3/2003
5 Gal Orgy 1 review summaries:
astroknight's
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 7/27/2005:
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
Shakina's Anal Video 3 review summaries:
astroknight's
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 8/2/2005:
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
(3.5 stars from 1 review)
Starring: Sarah, Paul, Laura, Lisa, Kris Knight
Studio: Shot At Home
Release date: 6/3/2003
3 Gal Romp 1 review summaries:
astroknight's
When Kris Knight and his wife Laura play, it seems like we win. Here they decide to play with bottle blonde Sarah, and it quickly turns into three gal and two guy sex party where almost anything goes. There's so much sex going on that the camera guys don't seem to know where to turn, but where ever they do they always seem to get something good. The technical aspects are a bit weaker than normal, but there's the usual Shot at Home clip reel to help out the extras. This is an amazing fuck flick. [read the full review]
review from 8/7/2007:
When Kris Knight and his wife Laura play, it seems like we win. Here they decide to play with bottle blonde Sarah, and it quickly turns into three gal and two guy sex party where almost anything goes. There's so much sex going on that the camera guys don't seem to know where to turn, but where ever they do they always seem to get something good. The technical aspects are a bit weaker than normal, but there's the usual Shot at Home clip reel to help out the extras. This is an amazing fuck flick. [read the full review]
(4.0 stars from 1 review)
Starring: Donna, Laura, Stephanie, Kelly, Kris Knight
Studio: Shot At Home
Release date: 6/3/2003
Donna & Kelly 1 review summaries:
astroknight's
Donna and Kelly, with the help of Kris and Laura, do a great job showing why amateur porn movies can be so enjoyable. There's plenty of chemistry throughout the movie, and there's never a moment when they don't all feel like they're having a great time as they play around. The main release is a bit short, but unlike so many other studios Shot at Home cares enough to give this one a little boost with a couple extra segments from Stephanie's series. They also care enough to give a bonus reel with segments from their other releases as well as keeping their technical aspects above average. If you want fun group sex, look no further than this release. [read the full review]
review from 6/10/2007:
Donna and Kelly, with the help of Kris and Laura, do a great job showing why amateur porn movies can be so enjoyable. There's plenty of chemistry throughout the movie, and there's never a moment when they don't all feel like they're having a great time as they play around. The main release is a bit short, but unlike so many other studios Shot at Home cares enough to give this one a little boost with a couple extra segments from Stephanie's series. They also care enough to give a bonus reel with segments from their other releases as well as keeping their technical aspects above average. If you want fun group sex, look no further than this release. [read the full review]
Elle: Ass Abused 1 review summaries:
astroknight's
Running Time: 60 min. Production Date: 2003 (although the disclaimer states the scenes were filmed pre - July 3, 1995) Director: None credited Cast: Elle and Nick Initial Expectations: The only DVD Ive seen from Shot at Home has been Lost Footage Vol. 1. It impressed me so much that I bought a couple more Shot at Home DVDs that Im going into with high expectations. Initial Reaction: Its darn hot! Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting realistic sex with a lot of anal Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting extremely rough anal sex Audio /Video Quality: The technical aspects vary quite a bit. Most of the audio is pretty good, but the balance is frequently a bit off and there are a few background noises. Some of the noises actually help the scene out, but some seem out of place and interfere with the scene, such as quite a bit of beeping that Im assuming came from the camera. The video also varies. Perhaps the biggest problem is the pixelation, which always seems to be a problem with features that were shot for the internet. [read the full review]
review from 6/26/2003:
Running Time: 60 min. Production Date: 2003 (although the disclaimer states the scenes were filmed pre - July 3, 1995) Director: None credited Cast: Elle and Nick Initial Expectations: The only DVD Ive seen from Shot at Home has been Lost Footage Vol. 1. It impressed me so much that I bought a couple more Shot at Home DVDs that Im going into with high expectations. Initial Reaction: Its darn hot! Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting realistic sex with a lot of anal Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting extremely rough anal sex Audio /Video Quality: The technical aspects vary quite a bit. Most of the audio is pretty good, but the balance is frequently a bit off and there are a few background noises. Some of the noises actually help the scene out, but some seem out of place and interfere with the scene, such as quite a bit of beeping that Im assuming came from the camera. The video also varies. Perhaps the biggest problem is the pixelation, which always seems to be a problem with features that were shot for the internet. [read the full review]
Laura's Dry Anal 3 review summaries:
astroknight's
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 1/19/2007:
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
(4.0 stars from 1 review)
Starring: Megan [I] (ambiguous)
Studio: Shot At Home
Release date: 6/3/2003
Megan Video Letters to Alaska 3 review summaries:
astroknight's
While Megan's husband is away for several months taking a job in Alaska, she agrees to send him video letters. There's a little talk about what's going on at work, around town, and with their families, but there's also plenty of sex as Megan and her husband want to keep their entire relationship full despite the distance. He lets her know things he'd like her to do, and although she's sometimes a bit reluctant, she always talks about it and in time usually grants his requests. The overall package is made even better by Shot at Home putting some good effort into the transfers and extras. Shot at Home has shown themselves to be one of the best amateur companies out there, and with Megan's third installment she continues to turn out one of their best series as well as one of the best solo girl series I've seen out there period. [read the full review]
review from 4/8/2007:
While Megan's husband is away for several months taking a job in Alaska, she agrees to send him video letters. There's a little talk about what's going on at work, around town, and with their families, but there's also plenty of sex as Megan and her husband want to keep their entire relationship full despite the distance. He lets her know things he'd like her to do, and although she's sometimes a bit reluctant, she always talks about it and in time usually grants his requests. The overall package is made even better by Shot at Home putting some good effort into the transfers and extras. Shot at Home has shown themselves to be one of the best amateur companies out there, and with Megan's third installment she continues to turn out one of their best series as well as one of the best solo girl series I've seen out there period. [read the full review]
(4.0 stars from 1 review)
Starring: Megan [I] (ambiguous)
Studio: Shot At Home
Release date: 6/3/2003
Megan Video Letters to Alaska 4 review summaries:
astroknight's
As she journeys into her fourth release, Megan shows nothing but growth. The movie is just as full of emotion as the previous episodes in the series while also adding some nice sexual growth with public masturbation and Megan trying not to get caught. The technical aspects are pretty average for an amateur release and there's the usual Shot at Home effort put into the extras to help it out as well. This series grabbed me hard with its first installment and shows no sigh of letting me go yet. [read the full review]
review from 9/15/2007:
As she journeys into her fourth release, Megan shows nothing but growth. The movie is just as full of emotion as the previous episodes in the series while also adding some nice sexual growth with public masturbation and Megan trying not to get caught. The technical aspects are pretty average for an amateur release and there's the usual Shot at Home effort put into the extras to help it out as well. This series grabbed me hard with its first installment and shows no sigh of letting me go yet. [read the full review]
(4.0 stars from 1 review)
Starring: Bob, Julie, Georgette, Kris Knight, Shakina
Studio: Shot At Home
Release date: 6/3/2003
Outdoor Whores 2 (Shot at Home) review summaries:
astroknight's
Running Time: 72 min. Production Date: 2003 (although the disclaimer states the scenes were filmed pre - July 3, 1995) Director: None credited Cast: Shakina, Julie, Georgette, Bob, and Kris Initial Expectations: Ive been really impressed with Shot at Homes movies so far, and am going into this one with high expectations. Initial Reaction: Its easily the best Ive seen from Shot at Home yet! Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting fun and realistic sex Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting extremely high technical aspects or extremely nasty sex Audio /Video Quality: The audio is clear and well balanced, especially for this type of movie. Yes, theres some background noise and you hear the cameramen, but it fits into the feature extremely naturally. The video has some pixelation, which is pretty normal from what Ive seen from Shot at Home. Thankfully, thats the biggest problem with the video. The lighting has a few shadows, but they feel natural and rarely interfere with the action. [read the full review]
review from 7/28/2003:
Running Time: 72 min. Production Date: 2003 (although the disclaimer states the scenes were filmed pre - July 3, 1995) Director: None credited Cast: Shakina, Julie, Georgette, Bob, and Kris Initial Expectations: Ive been really impressed with Shot at Homes movies so far, and am going into this one with high expectations. Initial Reaction: Its easily the best Ive seen from Shot at Home yet! Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting fun and realistic sex Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting extremely high technical aspects or extremely nasty sex Audio /Video Quality: The audio is clear and well balanced, especially for this type of movie. Yes, theres some background noise and you hear the cameramen, but it fits into the feature extremely naturally. The video has some pixelation, which is pretty normal from what Ive seen from Shot at Home. Thankfully, thats the biggest problem with the video. The lighting has a few shadows, but they feel natural and rarely interfere with the action. [read the full review]
(2.5 stars from 1 review)
Starring: John, Stephanie, Heather
Studio: Shot At Home
Release date: 5/27/2003
Lost Footage 2 review summaries:
astroknight's
Running Time: 59 min. Production Date: 2003 (although the disclaimer states the scenes were filmed pre - July 3, 1995) Director: None credited Cast: Stephanie, John, Heather, and John (with the guys names thanks to the Shot at Home website) Initial Expectations: Ive really liked what Ive seen from Shot at Home so far, so Im going in with high expectations once again. Initial Reaction: I love the voyeuristic aspect of this feature, but the camera work often felt amateurish even for amateur porn. Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting to indulge their more voyeuristic side Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting high quality technical aspects, nasty sex, or to see the girl a lot Audio /Video Quality: Although this feature contains extra footage from two completely different productions, the technical aspects are very consistent. The audio is clear and pretty well balanced. Theres a little background noise in the form of a television, but it actually enhances the scene rather than drawing away from it. The video is extremely different. [read the full review]
review from 7/28/2003:
Running Time: 59 min. Production Date: 2003 (although the disclaimer states the scenes were filmed pre - July 3, 1995) Director: None credited Cast: Stephanie, John, Heather, and John (with the guys names thanks to the Shot at Home website) Initial Expectations: Ive really liked what Ive seen from Shot at Home so far, so Im going in with high expectations once again. Initial Reaction: I love the voyeuristic aspect of this feature, but the camera work often felt amateurish even for amateur porn. Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting to indulge their more voyeuristic side Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting high quality technical aspects, nasty sex, or to see the girl a lot Audio /Video Quality: Although this feature contains extra footage from two completely different productions, the technical aspects are very consistent. The audio is clear and pretty well balanced. Theres a little background noise in the form of a television, but it actually enhances the scene rather than drawing away from it. The video is extremely different. [read the full review]
(3.5 stars from 1 review)
Starring: Kristen, Lara, Brandy
Studio: Shot At Home
Release date: 5/27/2003
Previews: Previews
Lost Footage 1 review summaries:
astroknight's
Running Time: 65 min. Production Date: 2003 (Oddly, the disclaimer screen states that all footage here was shot before 03July1995) Director: None credited Cast: Brandy, Lara, and Kristen Initial Expectations: I havent heard much about this new studio, but Im really enjoying amateur action lately so Im going in with some hope here. Initial Reaction: I have GOT to see more from this studio! Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting hot and fun sex with real emotion Who Should Avoid It: Anybody who needs high quality technical aspects Audio /Video Quality: As usual with amateur movies, the technical aspects lack a bit compared to most professional productions and theres a little variance from scene to scene. Lost Footage Vol. 1 is no different. The audio is pretty well balanced, but you still hear background noises like the still camera advancing the film and a few directions from the cameraman. There are also areas where the audio completely disappears. The video is similar. Theres some grain, which varies from scene to scene. [read the full review]
review from 5/26/2003:
Running Time: 65 min. Production Date: 2003 (Oddly, the disclaimer screen states that all footage here was shot before 03July1995) Director: None credited Cast: Brandy, Lara, and Kristen Initial Expectations: I havent heard much about this new studio, but Im really enjoying amateur action lately so Im going in with some hope here. Initial Reaction: I have GOT to see more from this studio! Who Should Watch It : Anybody wanting hot and fun sex with real emotion Who Should Avoid It: Anybody who needs high quality technical aspects Audio /Video Quality: As usual with amateur movies, the technical aspects lack a bit compared to most professional productions and theres a little variance from scene to scene. Lost Footage Vol. 1 is no different. The audio is pretty well balanced, but you still hear background noises like the still camera advancing the film and a few directions from the cameraman. There are also areas where the audio completely disappears. The video is similar. Theres some grain, which varies from scene to scene. [read the full review]