Adult DVD Talk reviewers have reviewed 11 porn movies from HomeSexTapes rating these videos the highest.
Reviews of HomeSexTapes Movies (11)
(3.5 stars from 1 review)
Starring: Missy Monroe, Britney Madison, Claire Dreams
Studio: HomeSexTapes
Release date: 5/23/2005
Blowjob Beauties 2 (HomeSexTapes) review summaries:
astroknight's
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 5/23/2005:
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
Ronda's Private Footage review summaries:
astroknight's
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 5/11/2005:
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
Mychelle's Big Black Snack review summaries:
astroknight's
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 2/26/2005:
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
Kinky Couple review summaries:
astroknight's
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 5/22/2005:
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
Hazel: 18 & Eager review summaries:
astroknight's
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 5/22/2005:
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
Devon & Daisy review summaries:
astroknight's
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 5/13/2005:
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
Anaya: Long Overdue For a Fuck review summaries:
astroknight's
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 5/12/2005:
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
Anal-Licking, Deep-Throating Slut review summaries:
astroknight's
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
review from 4/22/2004:
NOTE: This is an amateur video. Amateur and homemade movies dont have the budget nor the resources of studio porn, and therefore rarely get close to the same quality technically. Im rating this DVD on the same scale, but most homemade or amateur features would rarely make it above a 3 on the standard scale I use for studio porn for their technical aspects. The performers also arent normally the glamour stars one expects from studio porn, and instead use people who look like somebody you might encounter in your day to day life. Finally, the camera work has a different feel, as its often shot from a tripod or with somebody who doesnt have the technical training or experience of professional cameramen. That said, amateur and homemade features have a great charm to them, simple because the people in them are doing what theyre doing to have fun and because they enjoy it. [read the full review]
Fantastic Facial Finishes 2 review summaries:
astroknight's
Running Time: 64 min. (cover states 65 min.) Production Date: May 21, 2003 Director: None listed Cast: Danielle, Ander, Brittany, Chelsea, Gemini, Samantha, an unnamed blonde, and their men Initial Expectations: Ive been really impressed with what Ive seen from HomeSexTapes so far and am going into this one with high expectations! Initial Reaction: Its a very well done compilation! Who Should Watch It : Fans of oral sex and facials Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting consistent technical aspects or more than just head Audio /Video Quality: As usual with compilations, the technical aspects vary a bit throughout the feature. Theres a few background noises, with the most common one being noise from the camera itself. The video rangers from having a bit of grain and camera shake to being almost as good as releases from many of the big name studios. Theres a few remnants, but for amateur porn it looks pretty darn good! Music: None Menus: The main menu is very plain, and includes a few stills on a backdrop. [read the full review]
review from 10/31/2003:
Running Time: 64 min. (cover states 65 min.) Production Date: May 21, 2003 Director: None listed Cast: Danielle, Ander, Brittany, Chelsea, Gemini, Samantha, an unnamed blonde, and their men Initial Expectations: Ive been really impressed with what Ive seen from HomeSexTapes so far and am going into this one with high expectations! Initial Reaction: Its a very well done compilation! Who Should Watch It : Fans of oral sex and facials Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting consistent technical aspects or more than just head Audio /Video Quality: As usual with compilations, the technical aspects vary a bit throughout the feature. Theres a few background noises, with the most common one being noise from the camera itself. The video rangers from having a bit of grain and camera shake to being almost as good as releases from many of the big name studios. Theres a few remnants, but for amateur porn it looks pretty darn good! Music: None Menus: The main menu is very plain, and includes a few stills on a backdrop. [read the full review]
Can't Get Enough Cum review summaries:
astroknight's
Running Time: 76 min. (cover states 80 min.) Production Date: 3 / 31 / 2003 Director: None listed Cast: Danielle and her man Initial Expectations: Although Ive only seen Dusty: Fuck Me Till It Hurts from HomeSexTapes.com, it was impressive enough to give me high hopes going into this one! Initial Reaction: Its a great oral sex feature! Who Should Watch It : Fans of oral sex features Who Should Avoid It: Anybody who wants fucking Audio /Video Quality: Amateur features are never really known for having high technical aspects. This one is better than most, but will still probably disappoint anybody expecting technical aspects like you see from the top porn companies. The audio is clear and well balanced, but theres a hum in the background. Theres also a few background noises, such as the telephone, but unlike many places where you see the off-camera things ignored in the hopes that you wont notice them, they acknowledge that the phone rings and that it can wait. [read the full review]
review from 10/31/2003:
Running Time: 76 min. (cover states 80 min.) Production Date: 3 / 31 / 2003 Director: None listed Cast: Danielle and her man Initial Expectations: Although Ive only seen Dusty: Fuck Me Till It Hurts from HomeSexTapes.com, it was impressive enough to give me high hopes going into this one! Initial Reaction: Its a great oral sex feature! Who Should Watch It : Fans of oral sex features Who Should Avoid It: Anybody who wants fucking Audio /Video Quality: Amateur features are never really known for having high technical aspects. This one is better than most, but will still probably disappoint anybody expecting technical aspects like you see from the top porn companies. The audio is clear and well balanced, but theres a hum in the background. Theres also a few background noises, such as the telephone, but unlike many places where you see the off-camera things ignored in the hopes that you wont notice them, they acknowledge that the phone rings and that it can wait. [read the full review]
Dusty: Fuck Me Till It Hurts review summaries:
astroknight's
Running Time: 47 min. (cover states 50 min.) Production Date: 7 / 25 / 2003 Director: None listed Cast: Dusty and a couple of unnamed guys Initial Expectations: Ive really been enjoying amateur porn lately, so Im really looking forward to seeing what Hal Maroon has to offer! Initial Reaction: Its one of the hottest amateur titles Ive ever seen. Who Should Watch It : Anybody who likes or is just curious about amateur movies, anybody wanting to watch sex where it doesnt look like the reactions and emotions are faked Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting drop dead gorgeous performers or features that last two hours Audio /Video Quality: Amateur videos are never really known for having high technical aspects. That said, this one looks and sounds very good, and better than releases Ive seen from some of the major studios! The audio is slightly off balance and has a small hiss in the background at times, but other than that it sounds pretty good. [read the full review]
review from 10/30/2003:
Running Time: 47 min. (cover states 50 min.) Production Date: 7 / 25 / 2003 Director: None listed Cast: Dusty and a couple of unnamed guys Initial Expectations: Ive really been enjoying amateur porn lately, so Im really looking forward to seeing what Hal Maroon has to offer! Initial Reaction: Its one of the hottest amateur titles Ive ever seen. Who Should Watch It : Anybody who likes or is just curious about amateur movies, anybody wanting to watch sex where it doesnt look like the reactions and emotions are faked Who Should Avoid It: Anybody wanting drop dead gorgeous performers or features that last two hours Audio /Video Quality: Amateur videos are never really known for having high technical aspects. That said, this one looks and sounds very good, and better than releases Ive seen from some of the major studios! The audio is slightly off balance and has a small hiss in the background at times, but other than that it sounds pretty good. [read the full review]
