Fuck Dolls 5 Review
Red Light District
Studio: Red Light District
Category: Straight
Directed by: Jake Malone
Starring: Sean Michaels, Erik Everhard, Manuel Ferrara, Michael Stefano, Bobbi Eden, Courtney Cummz, Taryn Thomas, Karina Kay, Renee Richards, Naudia Nyce
Released on: 7/21/2005
|
|
||||||||||||||||
What's next in line for review:
ErotiK from Wicked Pictures, a very stylized piece of erotica with
Kaylani Lei and Keri Sable
| Director: | Jake Malone |
| Camera: | Jake Malone? |
| Genre: | Gonzo |
| Release: | 8/05 |
| Notes: | 3 hrs + 7 min Bonus Scene |
! Scroll down to the bottom to see an explanation of my rating system
|
act 1: |
Taryn
Thomas |
| APPEARANCE | SEX | TECHNICAL | |||
| Looks: |  |
Erotic: | |
Lighting/Colors: | |
| Outfit: | |
Energy: | |
Camerawork: |  |
|
Anal, A2M, DP, gapes, squirting, face-slapping, choking, dildo, Facials/swallow |
Chemistry: |
 |
|||
|
Sex Style |
TOTAL SCORE |
||||
 |
It's incredibly rare to have good chemistry when there's more than two people. That said, Taryn is able to connect well with both guys. The energy is inconsistent though, wavering between very high peaks and very low troughs- the volatility is a good thing but I'd rather have Taryn keep the energy at a higher mean level through heavy breathing. This scene lacks the money-shot filled tease that all the other scenes have, so it gets off on the wrong foot too. Highlights include:
|
|
act 2: |
Renee
Richards |
| APPEARANCE | SEX | TECHNICAL | |||
| Looks: | |
Erotic: | |
Lighting/Colors: | |
| Outfit: | |
Energy: | |
Camerawork: | |
|
Vag, riding crop, nipple clamps, horse-bit (gag), Facials/swallow |
Chemistry: |
 |
|||
|
Sex Style |
TOTAL SCORE |
||||
 |
The leather outfit ensemble here is quite unique and works incredibly well. The tease is amazing with its colorful fetish elements- very raunchy stuff and Renee is spot on with her lusty breathing. Loved the horse bit, a spicy alternative to the ball-gag, and especially loved the nipple clamps. She gives a great, heated performance. Next to zero chemistry yet still an effective scene. Highlights include:
|
|
act 3: |
Nadia
Sinn |
| APPEARANCE | SEX | TECHNICAL | |||
| Looks: | |
Erotic: | |
Lighting/Colors: | |
| Outfit: | |
Energy: | |
Camerawork: | |
|
Anal, A2M, gapes, Facial/Swallow |
Chemistry: |
|
|||
|
Sex Style |
TOTAL SCORE |
||||
 |
The tease here is another brilliant piece of work. Cuts of the sex audio that will follow next sporadically volumes up during the tease- very effective, first, as a literal tease- a tease of what's to come, and second, as a tool to keep the energy up during a segment which usually has little. Nadia always reminds me of a more slender Belladonna. They even have similar voices. She doesn't have the intensity though. The energy crawls along at a snail's pace here and never truly takes off. A few bursts of it but the scene never gains any momentum. Highlights include:
|
|
act 4: |
Bobbi
Dean |
| APPEARANCE | SEX | TECHNICAL | |||
| Looks: | |
Erotic: | |
Lighting/Colors: | |
| Outfit: | just tennies | Energy: | |
Camerawork: | |
|
Vag, Facials |
Chemistry: |
|
|||
|
Sex Style |
TOTAL SCORE |
||||
 |
Bobbi is really fit- tight tummy, toned muscular arms.... A real hard body. She looks like an older Britney Spears in some shots and I really love her look, her body most of all. Yet again, we have an top-notch tease. It has the teasing sex audio clips again too, as do the remaining scenes. There's really not much in this scene to distinguish itself but it's just great plain fucking. No gimmicks needed. She gives the most real performance with a subtle yet carnal lust. Highlights include:
|
|
act 5: |
Courtney
Cummz |
| APPEARANCE | SEX | TECHNICAL | |||
| Looks: | |
Erotic: | |
Lighting/Colors: | |
| Outfit: | |
Energy: | |
Camerawork: | |
|
Anal, A2M, gapes, anal beads, Facial/swallow x2 |
Chemistry: |
|
|||
|
Sex Style |
TOTAL SCORE |
||||
 |
The raunchiest performance in the movie. Courtney does excellent here, delivering raw, uninhibited moans. She really explodes when she orgasms and she looks incredibly cute while rubbing her clit. One of the weaker teases here but the sex makes up for it right away. Highlights include:
|
|
act 6: |
Karina
Kay |
| APPEARANCE | SEX | TECHNICAL | |||
| Looks: | |
Erotic: | |
Lighting/Colors: | |
| Outfit: | |
Energy: | |
Camerawork: | |
|
Vag, whip, squirting, Facial/swallow |
Chemistry: |
|
|||
|
Sex Style |
TOTAL SCORE |
||||
 |
Wow. This scene is utterly flawless. I loved everything about it. Karina looks perfect and delivers a fantastic energized performance with the chemistry also being right. There's lots of sexy camera shots here as well, making this my favorite scene of the year. Highlights include:
|
|
DISC EXTRAS |
|
|
THE BOTTOM LINE |
|
This has some of the strongest teases I've seen in awhile and the sex is great overall too- although some more energy could be had in a few scenes. But this movie has that amazing Karina Kay scene and also has a whole lot of crawling for those who like that- personally, I love it. I also liked the fact that the performers called each other by name in most of the scenes. Something so simple makes a vast difference in the chemistry, connecting the partners and making a more human and close experience for all, viewer included. If I didn't know better, I'd think that Jake actually told his performers to do this since I find it to be so rare in most other porn out at the moment. In fact, I think there's a good chunk of performers who don't even know each other by name, despite fucking with each other.
Jake usually has good ideas but it's his execution of it that usually falls short. That isn't the case here. I have no qualms with anything that was done- it all worked out quite effectively in the end. At 6 full scenes plus a bonus blowjob scene with cutie pie Claire Robbins you definitely get a lot of fuck for your buck here.
Very highly recommended
|
|
TOTAL SCORE: |
questions and comments welcome:
email me
Guide to my Rating System:
|
a scene: |
Performer
X |
| APPEARANCE | SEX | TECHNICAL | |||
| Looks: |  |
Erotic: | |
Lighting/Colors: | |
| Outfit: |  |
Energy: | |
Camerawork: |  |
| Chemistry: |
|
||||
|
Sex Style |
TOTAL SCORE |
||||
- The scene's TOTAL SCORE: 4.5 is derived from 3 categories only: APPEARANCE, SEX, and TECHNICAL aspects. Sex Style does not factor into the total score. More on that later
- These three categories carry different weights. To me and in the context of my rating system, SEX is slightly more important than APPEARANCE and of course each of these are more important than TECHNICAL aspects
- Within the categories, the sub-elements carry different weights, the higher elements having more weight than the bottom ones. For example, I deem a female's "Looks" more important than the "Outfit" she is wearing, and the scene's "Erotic" value is more important than both the scene's "Energy" and "Chemistry"
- The "Erotic" element is the most important element in the whole rating system. It's the overall erotic value that the sex has, not necessarily mutually exclusive with the other elements. However, the erotic element has more to do with a girl's performance than anything else. In gauging this rating I ask myself questions such as, "How good is her body motion? Tits bouncing sexily? Hips moving sexily? Does she arrange her body in a sexy manner?" or "Is her dirtytalk plausible? Is her performance realistic?" or "Does her moaning and breathing have heat? Is it sexy?"
- Each of the elements and categories are finely interwoven and dependent on each other. They are not necessarily mutually exclusive. i.e. A girl's "Looks" can be dependent on the scene's "Lighting" or "Camerawork." "Erotic" value can be dependent on the "Energy" in the scene or "Chemistry" or the "Camerawork" or the girl's "Looks."
- This rating system is my attempt to explain why a scene scored how it did. Each of the elements are different ways of looking at the scene and judging it. Although they are all deeply related, hopefully by examining the individual elements one gets a better perception and understanding of the scene.
Sex Style:
This isn't designed to be any indication of the strength of a scene. In breaking
style up into three choices:
normal dirty raunchy,
I try to give the reader a better feel for the scene. If I indicate a scene as raunchy,
that does not necessarily mean that it's full of gapes or ATM or double anals or
massive facials or cum-eating. I could be looking at the raunchiness of the
dirtytalk or the raunchiness of the body movement and moans- i.e. how hard a
girl is trying to get herself off, the amount of "rawness" in her
cowgirl bouncing and hip bucking; how horny she is. Similarly, if
I indicate a scene as normal that
does not necessarily mean that it's a couples scene! Although not designed to
indicate scene strength, I tend to favor the right side of the spectrum-
raunchy- and that's just my reviewer's slant. For me, raunchy usually means more
energy and usually means more erotic value. It's not limited to this though- I
have sometimes been blown away by the more "normal" scenes: genuine
passion and love for instance... In this case, this would be reflected with a
high "Erotic" and "Chemistry"
rating.
still have questions? email me
Check Prices for Fuck Dolls 5
The opinions expressed in this review of Fuck Dolls 5 from Red Light District are not necessarily the opinions of Adult DVD Talk. Adult DVD Talk provides a public forum for consumers to post their DVD reviews. Adult DVD Talk does not edit these reviews.