woody d

  • profile
Details
Date Joined: October 2005
Profile URL: https://www.adultdvdtalk.com/profile/woody-d




Recent Forum Posts
  • The Treatment Team 7/8/2008 12:34:20 AM
    I can't seem to edit my earlier posts, so I'm going to add a reply, then get back to it and try again.
  • Condoms in porn? Does it bother you? 5/6/2007 8:57:39 PM
    They ruin a scene for me. Now, two suggestions. First, instead of simply taking a poll, let's do something useful, and begin compiling lists of videos, where a lady that NORMALLY uses condoms, goes without, in that scene. That's worth a separate thread, which I'm going to start, under the name "Unusual non-condom scenes". Second: maybe we (as viewers) should encourage actresses who normally use condoms, to choose just one special partner, whom they trust, and do at least one or two non-condom scenes, with that special partner. If a lady wants to use a condom in her scenes, fine, that's up to her; but, for those of use who really, really, really don't like to watch those kinds of scenes, then just one or two scenes, shot with a &q...
  • Porn needs to be more inclusive of male-male sex 4/25/2007 2:58:42 AM
    As a straight guy, I just plain don't choose to watch gay scenes. It doesn't bother me in the slightest, what anyone does in his private life. But if/when gay guys start telling me that I should have to watch them go at it, even if I don't want to . . . well, this is another classic illustration of, your rights end, where my nose begins. The best way I can get the point across, to john45 and any others who support the idea of putting gay scenes into videos for people who don't choose to watch gay sex, is simply to propose the converse, and see how they respond. How would gays feel, if religious folks tried to start weaving messages into gay or bi porn, along the lines of, "If you try THIS approach, with counseling, and going to churc...
  • Most orgasmic girls 4/22/2007 11:47:08 AM
    Clam Digger, and all others - Hey, I'm not saying every porn actress should have an orgasm, in every scene, in every video. What I'm saying is that there ought to be some kind of series, where the focus, theme, and speciality is -- get this -- IN THIS PARTICULAR SERIES, the lady gets off. And, if she doesn't get off, then we simply use that scene in some OTHER video. Here's what Kimi Lixx said, and I very much agree with it: "I agree that most men don't know how to fuck. I don't just mean they don't know how to fuck well, I mean they don't even have the basic concept down. They fumble around trying to stick things in at the queerest angles that are never going to work. They're so out of shape they can't even establish a rhythm, let...
  • Best female orgasms 4/22/2007 2:38:52 AM
    There were several posts above about a scene with a "Loni". I'm not sure, but that might have been Loni Sanders, in a video called "Never So Deep". It's out on DVD, but it's from back in the 80's, and the picture quality is not so great, compared to modern stuff shot in digital. But even so, from when I first saw it, I never forgot it, because she had what I thought was the finest, most convincing and totally real orgasm I had ever seen, on film. When the DVD came out, many years later, that is definitely one that I went looking for, and got. If you're looking for a great female climax, on film, that one qualifies. And, it might even be the one that WhiteBoy was talking about, above ...
  • Most orgasmic girls 4/21/2007 9:56:47 PM
    Here's a simple compromise, to the issues/problems that prevent actresses from climaxing, in (I would estimate) about 98% of all adult video scenes. Someone should simply start a series, where one of the goals, promises, and guarantees is that every actress will indeed have a real and genuine climax, as part of her scene. Not with a toy or dildo (yes, I am indeed aware that there are already specialty videos doing that), but with a guy inside her (even if she has to hold a vibrator to her clit, while he's inside her, to get off). Since titles such as "Real Female Orgasms" are already taken (note, BTW, that they actually prove my point, that it is indeed possible ...), the title for this series could be something like, "Nice...
  • Most orgasmic girls 4/21/2007 9:53:31 PM
    Clam Digger - I like I said, I already know the stock replies. And your reply was a good and diligent sample. The point I want to make and emphasize is, except when it's too cold (which really is unsexy, I agree), there are ways to overcome each and every one of those problems, if a team of people tries. Problems with having to stop for still photographs? Fine -- then get the photographs done, and finished, and get that distraction out of the way. Or, stated another way, a producer and director can sequence, arrange, and produce a shooting that will lead to a female climax, as one part of the shoot. My next post will offer a simple, basic compromise. Because I hope it actually gets some attention, and maybe even some thought, and maybe e...
  • Most orgasmic girls 4/21/2007 1:13:34 AM
    One other comment -- if a woman really wants to fake an orgasm, she can, and she can make it convincing. The trick is to realize and respect the fact that real orgasms don't last for several long minutes, continuously. Instead, there needs to be a buildup, an orgasmic peak, and then a descent and resolution. Do you "professionals" really need an outsider like me, to tell you that kind of stuff? Edited by - woody d on 4/21/2007 1:21:52 AM
  • Most orgasmic girls 4/21/2007 1:05:59 AM
    I have never understood why nearly EVERY scene doesn't lead to a woman actually and genuinely climaxing. Now, I already know the stock responses. However, consider how those problems could be overcome, for just about any lady willing to screw in front of a camera, without a whole lot of time or expense, just by actually trying, and by using some readily available tools. If a battery-powered vibrator isn't enough, then get a plug-in ("inductrial strength" vibrator, a "rabbit", or whatever the woman likes best. Teach the guys to use their tongues, fingers, etc., if they don't already know. And, if necessary, get most of the crew out of the room, and let just one quiet and discrete guy hold a small digital camcorder. As a ...
  • Fullest mouth? 4/15/2007 2:51:36 AM
    The most hysterically funny cartoon I ever saw, in a mens' magazine, was on this subject, a year or two ago, in Hustler (if I recall correctly). A young couple was saying goodnight, at her door. The caption was something like, "I'd really like to kiss you good night, Janice [or whatever name] . . . but not until you spit that out." The drawing was so damn good, it nearly made my knees buckle, in the store where I saw it. If anyone can find it, and post it, that should. It was one of the funniest cartoons ever published.
  • What's the appeal of so many cumshots? 4/10/2007 3:06:19 PM
    BDG - I can understand, agree with, and accept much of what you say, on an occasional basis, to add variety, spice, etc to a relationship or sex life. But does the same thing have to happen, every damn time? For example, if some guy wanted to come on your face, once every couple of months or so, fine. As long as that's okay with you, hey, enjoy it, any way you can. But, if some guy absolutely had to do it that way, EVERY SINGLE TIME you ever had sex, and would NEVER come inside you . . . well, after a while, you'd probably start thinking he was kind of sick in the head, and it was an unhealthy relationship that wouldn't ever really go anywhere. Or, as described in "The Joy of Sex," pickles can be great. They can add some real n...
  • What's the appeal of so many cumshots? 4/8/2007 2:52:30 AM
    Sorry I didn't stay current on this; had to keep up with some other things for a while. In reply to RP, I've been looking -- damn hard -- for the kind of porn I'd like to see. Which would be along the lines of healthy, intelligent, and attractive young people, who act genuine, natural, and real. And, I've probably seen hundreds and hundreds of adult videos, in that search (which is probably a clue as to why some guys just keep looking and looking, and looking for more -- because they STILL have not yet found what they want). For me, the problem is not that it sometimes happens. It's that it ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS happens in just damn near EXACTLY the same way, with monotonous regularity. The only variety (if you call it variety ...) is wh...
  • The Treatment Team 2/10/2007 3:29:49 PM
    There were some great comments in the "Frantic fucking" thread, but -- weirdly -- it got locked, apparently because a nasty asshole-related comment got posted in it (which apparently was completely by accident; it had nothing whatever to do with any prior posts in that thread). So, that might turn out to be be a convenient way to force this discussion over to this heading, instead. And, I'd much rather keep it here than go to the "Features" area, because this area gets 20 times as much traffic (thanks anyway, threesomebody). Without wanting to seem like a glib motivational speaker, every problem that someone pointed out, while entirely real, valid, and needing attention, can be overcome somehow. As two quick examples: ...
  • The Treatment Team 2/9/2007 12:40:41 AM
    To try to jump-start this thread, I'm going to give an example. To me, the idea below seems so clear and easy yet flexible and useful, I can't figure out why no one has done it. But, apparently, no one ever has. The starting point is this: a guy graduates from college, and moves to a big city. Or, he gets transferred by his employer, or whatever. So, now he's got to meet some new ladies, and start dating. Once he gets to that new big city (say, LA, SF, San Diego, Seattle, Chicago, Dallas, NYC, Boston, DC, Atlanta, Miami, etc.), where does he go, what kinds of lines does he use to start conversations, and who does he meet? The title of the series? "Learning to Love [insert name of city]". For each city, weave in landmarks, popula...
  • Frantic fucking . . . uncool, unsexy 2/9/2007 12:28:31 AM
    Okay, some more interesting comments have been posted. But once again, I'd rather try to turn this in a positive direction, and create something better, instead of just griping about what we don't like. My post under the label "The Treatment Team" hasn't gotten a single reply yet, so I'm going to bump it up, by putting in another post. I hope it might become a jump-start, to get people thinking, and I'd love to see any of you folks over there. Especially Kimi (in complete seriousness, Kimi, I honestly don't know whether I should see any of your videos; you've got my imagination going about you in a real nice direction, and I'd love to just let it keep going that way for a while). To me, the idea below seems so clear and easy ye...
  • Frantic fucking . . . uncool, unsexy 2/2/2007 2:09:27 PM
    Wow . . . some really great posts here! I'm going to offer a couple of points and suggestions, and try my best to set up a separate thread, under the name "The Treatment Team". The starting point is this: we don't have to change, or fix, anyone or anything else, in order to create a set of adult videos that would be better than whatever else is out there today. Those other folks can do whatever they want. The only thing it would take, to create genuinely better videos that might seriously catch on and become cross-over videos that would appeal to large markets that are being turned off today, would be a very small team of people, willing to put in nothing but a few hours of their time, in exchange fo co-ownership of something tha...
  • Frantic fucking . . . uncool, unsexy 2/1/2007 5:59:01 PM
    I initially posted a reply here, but realized it's a separate-but-overlapping problem. So, I moved it to a new topic, under "Pathetically short strokes". The thing is, those are two sides of the same coin. And a couple of simple, easy, zero-cost changes could make for some greatly improved scenes, in a lot of adult videos. Edited by - woody d on 2/1/2007 6:07:13 PM
  • Better use of multi-angle DVD's 1/15/2007 2:06:06 PM
    Hardware wrote: Basically, you're describing what's already done for "Virtual Sex With" DVD's. Maybe I should check out some recent titles in that series. I tried several, a few years ago, and they were nothing but "POV"-type shots that rarely even contained any b/g penetration (dildos and masturbation only, etc). Anyone care to recommend some good titles, with more than just dildos? And, I stand behind my comments that I feel short-changed, and cheated, whenever some video skips completely over any vaginal sex, and goes straight to anal, when the DVD is NOT advertised as an anal feature. I'd like to see producers use the multi-angle capability of DVD's to avoid that problem, not just in "Virtual Sex" DVD's, b...
  • Swank widescreen format 1/12/2007 1:34:06 AM
    Typical setup for a WHOLE lot of homes is, when a big screen (i.e., widescreen, 16x9) TV is bought, it goes into the FAMILY room, and the regular (4x3) TV gets sent into the basement or bedroom. That's certainly what happened at my house, and at 90% of the homes I know with widescreen TV's. Now, guess how many guys like watching porn in their FAMILY room. It doesn't take a genuis to realize that most porn gets watched on 4x3 screens. So, if any pseudo-artsy types with delusions of grandeur want to make widescreen porn, they should be required to put a warning label on the box, and on their internet ads. eBay ought to adopt that requirement, too.
  • The appeal of smooth-shaved beavers 9/25/2006 1:53:57 AM
    I wanted to add another post, to bump this up near the top again. Surely there have been some recently issued fully-shaved scenes worth seeing. And, I would add Amber Rayne (not to be confused with Amber Rain ...) and Belicia Avalos to the list of always-fully-shaved.
more posts from woody d
Join the Adult DVD Talk community and create your own profile! Adult DVD Talk is the most active community of porn fans and industry insiders. Stay on top of who's hot, know what's coming down the porn pipeline, and hang out with fellow porn people. Membership is free and gives you access to the backdoor (the front one too!) Join Now!