• profile

Recent Forum Posts

• Real-couples *group* videos? 6/27/2006 10:49:36 PM
  
  astroknight: thanks. I've just checked and they seem to have Vol 1 available now. (BTW, astroknight, off-topic but let me know if you want a rundown of the typical content of the straight SEVP titles. I noticed on your studio list that you imply (I think) that you haven't seen much from this studio. Sorry if that's changed. Or maybe I'll just put some reviews in the review section. I have several of theirs and have seen more).

• Real-couples *group* videos? 6/27/2006 9:59:27 PM
  
  Thanks! LOL... maybe I was being too slapdash when I said that total number of participants was not important! 500 is pushing it (are pushing it? ) a bit. Perhaps somewhere between four and a dozen is a bit more like it, although I'll keep an open mind. I have begun to investigate the video on offer at sites such as shotathome and homesextapes, and several others, but wondered if there are any very small studios, series or similar that I might be missing. BTW, Underground's inexpensive four-hour White Urban Cock Party (such a charming name) series is NOT, of course, amateur, but some of the scenes are very good. There's one I might even ask an ID about later.

• Real-couples *group* videos? 6/27/2006 8:52:49 PM
  
  Can anyone recommend any good amateur DVDs/VODs that simply feature averagely attractive *real* couples (any age, say, 18-45) having group sex in someone's home or hotel room? Nothing themed, SM, or anything, doesn't have to be superbly edited and the participants don't need to be perfect or shaved... just reasonably HWP folks screwing their own partners and each other's? Anal or some FF is fine. Not fussy either about total number of participants. Anyone who has suggestions or who owns any good discs/tapes is welcome to let me know. Thanks.

• Write your own? 6/26/2006 5:35:26 PM
  
  Redish wrote: As for destroying them, why not just join a forum, pick a name, say, I don't know, skargarden2 for instance, and see if anyone else likes them. One of the beauties of the internet is anonymity. That forum might even have a place to post such things, but I digress. Redish - I get the hint. [;)] Thanks. But back to topic, I, of course, encourage you to write these out. If for nothing else than your own mental exercise. Maybe share some of them with the rest of us. Yes, indeed. As you suggest here and elsewhere in your post, much of the writing is very personal and specific... but (and this where RT's encouragement comes in) I see no reason why I shouldn't tweak, change names, etc., IF the stuff I write for myself has an energy...

• Write your own? 6/26/2006 1:02:41 AM
  
  Recoil Therapy wrote: skargarden1 wrote: For me, the writing's just a discreet and personal part of the whole sex-life jigsaw, like ephemeral jamming by a musician that doesn't actually get recorded. Does that make sense? It does but it is sad. To put it in perspective, some of my favorite albums are those where the musicians just jam & have a great time expressing their art. If you really are that good then keep them somewhere. It isn't like you can't be anonymous on the internet (for the most part). RT Phew. For a moment there I thought you were saying that my occassional fantasy-writing thing, just for my own satisfaction, was sad. Then I read on and saw exactly what you meant. I'm relieved: I'd put my writing thing into either the &q...

• Write your own? 6/26/2006 12:54:28 AM
  
  Sorry, me again. I'll shut up in a moment. Just making it clear: when I said to RT that "you're quite right about the peril" of keeping written fantasies around, I was most definitely talking generally. In other words, I think RT has hit on a sound caution for anyone reading this and thinking of retaining their writing. I wasn't hinting that it has been a problem for me personally because, as I say, I don't keep 'em.

• Write your own? 6/26/2006 12:34:46 AM
  
  I agree with you, RT, but what I maybe did not make clear is that as soon as I'm done I destroy them *immediately*. No exceptions. Leading on from that, I tend to write when I have the luxury of time and my own company. So it's not something I often have the time to do. You're quite right about the peril if they're kept around. As far as writing 'okay-for-other-eyes' erotica goes, I am a writer anyway and am seriously considering experimenting in this. So, again: it's a moment-to-moment experience for me, the writing, not something I keep and look back at proudly/furtively later. Thanks for the comments and concern. For me, the writing's just a discreet and personal part of the whole sex-life jigsaw, like ephemeral jamming by a musician t...

• POR NED (world cup lol) 6/25/2006 11:56:29 PM
  
  I think I've been on the forum too much these past few days. I just glanced up at the TV (I'm watching the World Cup) and on the screen in huge letters was: POR NED I read it as one word at first, but it was actually trailing the upcoming PORtugal NEDerlands game. Maybe I should have a quiet lie down. lol.

• Write your own? 6/25/2006 11:49:25 PM
  
  Thanks so far, everyone. And thanks for those great links, Croy. I'll be really interested to see whether other ADT folks write their own... and especially perhaps just as an intensifier for themselves rather than to be read by others. I think that, as much as anything, what intrigues me about finding out is that masturbation usually has a prettty limited array of 'furniture' around it to help it along: there's imagination/memory, porn, toys, and maybe one or two other things such as putting on certain music. And yet the (to me) obviousness of writing it all down for your own pleasure seems a very easy and intuitive aid to masturbation. Given that most of us probably have much the same set of opportunities and resources when it comes to ma...

• Write your own? 6/25/2006 10:09:31 PM
  
  By the way, it might be that some folks are afraid to write their most cherished fantasies or experiences down because they think that doing so will trap/'finish' that fantasy or memory for them. Uh-uh. Not if I'm anything to go by, LOL. I am here by myself for three weeks while my family is away so I have time to, let's say, express myself and write a lot... far from exhausting the imagination I've found that I have, sometimes unintentionally, surprised myself by how the writing can develop from evening to evening. It can just take you deeper, rather than shove your imagination in a cage. You just need to go at it with abandon. That's my experience anyway. Having porn playing and/or a cold beverage to hand might help you along. Ah, well: ...

• Write your own? 6/25/2006 9:51:45 PM
  
  jayo: yes, I don't think I'm the only one to have found a Nancy F. book at home (Men In Love) and been first introduced to the grand old wide-ranging world of sexual fantsasy that way. I still have a copy, I think, somewhere. I very vividly recall a guy whose fantasy was a white family of three having sex with a black family in a basement. The whole thing about which of the horny black family picked who for sex (and what they did in that cellar! LOL) was a real "Oh, NOW I get it!" sort of moment. Almost like permission to enjoy fantasy and start feeling really sexually free. You might or might not like NF's analyses and comments, but the hundreds of private fantasies and pieces of sexual history in that book are way worth the mon...

• Write your own? 6/25/2006 9:40:02 PM
  
  I'm curious: does anyone else here write their own sex fantasies/experiences/scenarios down, maybe while masturbating or (probably more rarely; I don't) for their partner to read? One advantage is that this can be a very good way to hold off orgasm. Also, when you're done you can just rip it all up or burn it if you don't relish the idea of keeping what you write. And there's no pressure for the writing to be of a particular quality or to restrict your topics. It's oddly liberating. It's interesting that books of fantasies (such as Nancy Friday's collections) and stories shared online are very popular. Just wondered whether anyone 'bothers' to write stuff for *themselves*. All it takes is a notepad and a 10-cent pen. You might want to try...

• hairy girls becoming more fashionable ? 6/25/2006 6:11:13 AM
  
  Back again: something else this topic tends to lead to is what can crudely be called the US-vs-Euro-porn-woman difference. As I post this I have on in the background a regular Hollywood comedy with a tall, slim and beautiful blond heroine, and it got me thinking that many leggy, lantern-breasted and maybe smooth-shaved US porn performers are not usually my taste (blimey, listen to me. But you know what I mean). Actually I kinda surprised myself when I found myself asking on this froum yesterday about the ID of a tall brunette (come to think of it she's European, but anyway). Anyway, a lot of Scandinavian or German girls in European porn are average height, quite often have bushes, and are creamy skinned rather than tan. And the guys are oft...

• hairy girls becoming more fashionable ? 6/25/2006 5:43:25 AM
  
  cochise wrote: I love and have always preferred the full bush. It's more womanly, shaved is more girlish. It signals sexual maturity, breedability and for me, erotica. The smell of a vagina is also sexually stimulating, unless it's overly ripe or due to a medical problem. But the smell that builds each day charges up some primitive access point in my brain that sends blood directly to my nether regions. Well said, cochise. Above all (so to speak) it's the whole woman I find attractive, but I've found more and more that those women -- who I either know or have seen in porn -- with bushes are wonderful that way. I've known a few girls who are in an industry where they have to trim somewhat, but they don't shave completely by any means. Whi...

• ID of performer in 'DPS & Orgies' ? 6/24/2006 2:21:20 AM
  
  Delaware - thanks to your suggestions, I have worked out that it is Kamelia. She seems only to have done the movie I talked about and also is in scene five of Born To Be Buttwoman. Kamelia was the only name left after working through the others credited for that "DPs..." scene, and it is her. Again, cheers.

• ID of performer in 'DPS & Orgies' ? 6/24/2006 12:13:49 AM
  
  Delaware - thanks so much. Interestingly, the girl in the photo you linked to looks like she is the *other* brunette in the 'DPs & Orgies' scene. Also, in the review on this site of 'DPs & Orgies', POQUITO identifies Charlotte/Charlotta as being the girl you mention, I think. The performer I'm trying to name is the other brunette in the scene (I know you have not seen it, BTW, I'm just clarifying). In this group scene she's very active and looks very enthusiastic and natural. For what it's worth, the girl I'm talking about seems hard to find anywhere else.

• ID of performer in 'DPS & Orgies' ? 6/23/2006 9:24:25 PM
  
  Hi, everyone. Question: in the last scene of Elegant Angel's original "DPs and Orgies", can anyone identify the brunette who really kinda leads the start of this group scene? She is wearing a pink dress, is sitting on the extreme left at the beginning, and is the first girl to be lifted onto the, er, lunch table. If you have this DVD it will be very obvious who I mean because she is the focus of attention for a good couple of minutes before the other talent get involved. One or two reviews make me think her name's Charlotta -- that name is indeed credited as being part of the scene -- but she seems to look different here from the Charlotta in Fill Her Up #1. The performer is excellent in this scene. Has she done anything else? Th...