• profile

Recent Forum Posts

• Diagonal camera angles suck! 1/29/2004 6:10 AM
  
  TonyC wrote: It's also an example of a problem that is easily solved with good editing. We wanna see the close-up of the two dicks in her holes, we wanna see the long shot of her body and face, we wanna see a close up of her face to get some idea of whether she's in pain, pleasure, or just bored. Good editing would give us all that (and more!) without seeming fake or interupting the flow of the scene. And as an editor, I'd like to give you all of that in a cohesive flow that follows the classical paradigm. But that assumes that the director and/or camera guy gave me the necessary footage. Unfortunately, that rarely happens. All too often I get nothing but still shots from a still photographer doing double duty as a videographer who shoot...

• Diagonal camera angles suck! 1/21/2004 3:39 PM
  
  It's called a Dutch Tilt. Unfortunately, the average porn camera operator hasn't the foggiest clue what it's called or when to use it or why. The only reason they use it is because their cheap $800 camcorders don't have a wide angle lens and the motel or apartment they're shooting in is too small for them to back up sufficiently for them to frame a shot side-to-side. A diagonal shot simply gives them more screen real estate. Andy