• profile

Recent Forum Posts

• Porn Hub 12/17/2020 2:16:48 AM
  
  evilpineapples wrote: Raising the age will solve none of the problems being talked about by the pundits and the anti-porn lobbyists. I respectfully disagree. The accusations against PH are more about CP and underage performers than unverified accounts.

• Porn Hub 12/16/2020 11:46:06 PM
  
  evilpineapples wrote: I can only hope we are very careful about making a distinction between real terms-of-service changes (like those related to record-keeping requirements for uploaders) and reactionary content censorship (like the notion of getting rid of the "teen" category). Whether or not you personally approve of "teen" porn, find it squicky, believe that it promotes inappropriate ideas about underage girls, or whatever else, it should be legally protected as freedom of expression as long as it was produced in full compliance with the law. The reason Pornhub was so vulnerable to this latest, and quite successful, attack is that they were not verifying that their uploaders were in compliance with the law, which unfortunately allowed...

• Porn Hub 12/16/2020 7:44:12 PM
  
  gooch wrote: ^ I don't believe it's necessary either, the removal of Teen as a category, nor would I be keen on the idea of it either - simply put I would likely to see more 18 & 19 year olds in my adult entertainment and not less. I personally got no problem with legal teens exploring their sexuality in film but we live in an age of disinformation and hysteria over young people and sex. We live in a time when a 20yr old dating a 17yr old is seen as pedophilic. The word pedophilia is not being used in its scientific term but rather as a tool to attack whatever you find uncomfortable about sex.We live in such hysteria that any older person dating a younger person is seen as creepy and exploitative, also this comes from all across the politi...

• Porn Hub 12/16/2020 1:15:58 PM
  
  evilpineapples wrote: The long and short of it is that any platform which allows for the anonymous upload of pornographic content is a liability disaster waiting to happen. That business model is just not compatible with the spirit of USC 2257. Yes, Section 230 does insulate these companies from legal liability (at least for the moment), but that's not good enough. Porn will always be the target of intense scrutiny, rightly or wrongly, and will always have to contend with moral guardians who would love to see the whole enterprise come crashing down, so it's imperative for the industry to be proactive and self-regulate before that responsibility is taken out of its hands and given to outsiders. (Government regulation of adult material is a ...

• Porn Hub 12/15/2020 11:01:35 AM
  
  ^ You gotta give it to these anti porn religious groups they know how to play the long game. They already got success when they convinced credit card companies not to support certain legal niches. They will use this made up pedophilia hysteria to justify their ban on teen porn. I mean we live in a society where a 20 yr old finding a 17yr old attractive is deemed as pedophilic but these same religious nuts had no problems with underage marriage 60 yrs ago.

• Porn Hub 12/15/2020 8:46:56 AM
  
  I'll bet my next stimulus check that the next category to be taken off will be TEEN, it seems to be the major cause of all this CP and underage performer scare. Mark my words.