• profile

Recent Forum Posts

• The point of 'props' in GGG/666 12/30/2007 7:52:37 AM
  
  shark1 wrote: Ryan1481 wrote: I checked out bukkakeshop.com recently because Sex Box 27 was the last one he did and for a few months no other ones were being released so i thought he cancelled the series but another couple have been released so i guess the authorities let him off. But i must admit, i haven't seen the older pissing films. For me, though, it is more the visual imagery that i like, rather than the actual act itself. I don't think i would want to participate in a pissing scene but for voyeuristic purposes, it's great. As for Piss-Box, I don't know what they can do to make it different from Sex Box, since Sex Box already focuses on pissing, unless they make the girls swallow more piss or get even more men to piss on them....?...

• The point of 'props' in GGG/666 12/27/2007 3:25:11 AM
  
  caroline-NL wrote: Ryan1481 wrote: "For me, though, there aren't that many different ways to shoot "golden shower" films, apart from choosing the type of girls, lighting, camera angles, etc. When you get right down to it, pissing is pissing," It isnt. Have you seen some of the older Seventeen Specials of the early 90s, ("Wet Lust", "Golden Shower Special") etc. ? You will see the difference at once. Especially lust, but also erotic are missing in GGG and similiar movies. Instead of focusing on the beauty of the girls and the SLOW development of the scene, its just a concentration on the "bizarre" scenes, how many can piss as much as possible. It looks like a record show, as if they want to ...

• The point of 'props' in GGG/666 12/24/2007 10:44:50 AM
  
  caroline-NL wrote: @Ryan: Because its XXX-Mas, I will try to be polite and friendly in my answer. ( GGG is grrrrrrr making me angry ......) Many of the GGG women only shot 1-3 movies. Especially on 666, many shot only one. Even the most ignorant men are able to see, that most of the girls dont like what they do. There ARE a few exceptions, like Annette Schwarz and very few others, but these are the exception, not the rule. And some desperately need the money, Munich is the most expensive town in whole Germany. I say it again, I like golden shower games, I also enjoyed group sex and its a great turn on for me to be "golden showered". I like the smell and the taste of urine, but even I dislike 666 and Sexbox, Pissbox movies. There...

• The point of 'props' in GGG/666 12/24/2007 5:11:27 AM
  
  caroline-NL wrote: Eduardo911, my friend. It sounds, as if we are talking about the difference between male and female feelings. ;-) In my opinion, every JT "movie" degrades women. The language is primitive, there is no story, its erotic as an old car tire. Its the way, how he asks the women. You cant only translate it, but you have to hear the voice of the models. Its like they read it from a teleprompter. Most of porn talk is fake, nowadays. In US porn too, you have these faked interviews, but sometimes you can catch the true opinion of the model. I bet, that 90% of the models ONLY do it for the money and the missing 10% enjoy sex, but they arent happy with the way the porn movies are presented. I am sorry Eduardo991, I know qu...

• The point of 'props' in GGG/666 11/19/2007 3:24:25 AM
  
  eduardo911 wrote: [ caroline-NL wrote: JT talks are always the same " Take this ! Open your mouth ! So many sperm - only for you. If you dont like it, please pretend, that you like it. Think on the money you get, when this is over. Take this, you bitch. And the only thing you ever wanted to do was fucking and sucking. etc." Does he really say that, Caroline? "Please pretend, think of the money you'll get after this" etc or is it something you believe he thinks when filming? No he doesn't . In over a hundred GGG/JT/666 movies I've seen (I own about 30) I NEVER heard him say ANYTHING like: "If you dont like it, please pretend, that you like it. Think on the money you get, when this is over. Take this, you bitch.&quot...

• The point of 'props' in GGG/666 11/17/2007 1:16:19 PM
  
  caroline-NL wrote: 90% of the GGG Girls arent my type. Many look very similiar, "JT" prefers a type of a woman that I reject totally. JT talks are always the same " Take this ! Open your mouth ! So many sperm - only for you. If you dont like it, please pretend, that you like it. Think on the money you get, when this is over. Take this, you bitch. And the only thing you ever wanted to do was fucking and sucking. etc." I think, only idiots with an IQ lower as Alfred E. Neumanns can really listen to this. ( The ad with "1OO Euros" is paid for customers, who help JT in catching bootleggers. This was a problem in the late 90s, when they were still released on VHS. But now even the "Pirates" are bored of ...

• The point of 'props' in GGG/666 11/17/2007 3:26:10 AM
  
  caroline-NL wrote: I really, really doubt, that JT pays 500 Euro. Why should he ? Ive watched the covers of GGG for some years, and rented around 2 dozens, but dont do this anymore. Annette is either having fun and/or a professional. And a few others are too. I think an actress called "Janine" was really into it, and there are women who enjoy golden shower games ( me too ). But not in this terrible scenery...... Many really dont like it, and the sad thing is, that many men like, that the women dont like it. The titles of the GGG movies say it all ( and if you dont understand german, I can only congratulate you ) The problem is, the few women who enjoy porn acting and golden shower games, if they dont want to travel outside of G...

• The point of 'props' in GGG/666 11/14/2007 10:52:20 AM
  
  PaellaMan wrote: Even 500 is a too low fee for doing what they're doing!!! Betty & Annette seems like they were having a good time, but I watched some chicks having a really bad time. I stop watching their movies some time ago, but I think is still the same. As for the bowl... I think is a way to check visually the amount of cum / piss / drool they're gonna gulp. UCK! I agree, PaellaMan. But I guess if that's all JT is willing to pay them, then they don't have much of a choice (other than simply saying 'no' and looking for a job elsewhere) It's normally quite easy to tell which girls like it and which ones don't. Those girls that you tend to see in multiple films i.e. Betty, Annette, Magdalena, etc, do like it. Those who only do one or a ...

• The point of 'props' in GGG/666 11/14/2007 5:06:18 AM
  
  preid2 wrote: The term crackwhore comes to mind! Actually, I have asked Annette Schwarz (probably the most well-known GGG girl) about girls taking drugs in GGG and she said that while there are some who take drugs (like in every porn company, I suppose) many of them are just desperate for some quick money and disappear after one shooting.

• The point of 'props' in GGG/666 11/13/2007 2:20:04 PM
  
  caroline-NL wrote: I wrote it before. Its no coincident, that GGG is located in Munich, its the most expensive town in Germany. But I doubt, that they pay only 100 Euros. ( what is a "shoot" ? A whole movie ? ) It isnt such a problem to find a job in Munich, that is better paid. There is a big demand for small jobs, like delivering newspapers, selling keepsakes, books, or better paid promotion work, etc. So if you work 6,7,8 hours, you have your 100 Euros. I never understood, why women are doing things they dont want, only for ( very little ) money. If US companies would pay as bad as german porn companies, I doubt, that they would get any models at all. And the GGG/666 inherit all the things, that represent a bad porn movie. Mo...

• The point of 'props' in GGG/666 11/11/2007 4:38:11 AM
  
  cubesnake wrote: Hmm, somehow i think if you would be around on one of their shoots and see "how much" fun it is for (obviously) a lot of girls to be in "those" films you may have problems to jerk of ever again. Not that ive been there but theres nothing worse than watching someone who doesnt enjoy what he/she is doing ... and it shows in a lot of their so called films Cube That's what I've always never understood, cubesnake. From what I can gather, the girls get 100 Euros for each shoot. That sort of money is pathetic really yet there always seems to be a steady stream of applicants. Some seem to move from cum-based films to piss-based films for reasons I can't fathom because apparently they don't get paid any more for...

• The point of 'props' in GGG/666 11/10/2007 1:11:10 PM
  
  Texan wrote: I haven't the foggiest notion. However, I definitely am turned on by the girl accumulating massive amounts of cum which has got to be a surer thing if she has a bowl to keep it in. I also think it's very hot to watch a girl chug lots of spunk from a glass/bowl/goblet, etc. Plus it makes it easier to perform extended cumplay. Sooooo, more bowls filled w/ cum is what I want to see. No argument there, Texan :) It's just a curiosity: why some girls use these 'props' while others don't....

• Have you ever loved a porn star? 10/17/2007 4:09:41 AM
  
  By 'love' I assume you are asking if I've ever felt an emotional bond between them? If that's the case, then definately not. However, I have 'loved' plenty of curvy asses

• What to do....? 8/31/2007 3:15:13 AM
  
  lindi wrote: My experience is that guys take about 5 minutes to get off with oral, but I knew one guy who wouldn't even let me try, because he said it had been tried before and wouldn't work. So it varies. It wouldn't be very unusual for a guy to take 20 minutes. One way to make things go a little easier is to do some oral, then have sex until he's ready to cum, then switch back to oral, which is then usually quick and satisfying. I mentioned this to one guy who had trouble getting off from oral, and he said, "a light bulb went off" in his head. He tried it, and, problem solved! No more wife with an aching jaw, and he got what he wanted. That's what we did, lindi. But the oral only lasted about a couple of mins before having sex...

• What to do....? 8/31/2007 3:09:23 AM
  
  Ivory wrote: I'm saying that most individuals have a time limit as to how long they can suck dick before their jaws start hurting, and it's a lot shorter than 90 minutes. I have no idea if you take so long to come for physiological or psychological reasons, I was pointing out that your desire for 1 1/2 to two hours of sustained oral stimulation is not very realistic. If the two women you're about to see can fulfill your request, more power to you. Now, I never said that that my desire was for 90 minutes to two hours oral stimulation. I said that's how long I take to cum when watching porn. I do take regular breaks, though, I don't jerk-off for 90 minutes without stopping.

• What to do....? 8/30/2007 1:37:13 PM
  
  Ivory wrote: Trying to put this in a tactful way, if you need that many minutes to come, I strongly doubt anyone will be able to get you off by sucking your dick. BTW, are you telling me that when someone watches porn, they cum within 20 mins? There is no chance I'd be able to do that. Even if I could, I wouldn't want to. I see sex as something to be enjoyed and prolonged, not something to try and get over with asap. Maybe that means there's something physiologically wrong with me but that's the way I am, sorry about that.

• What to do....? 8/30/2007 1:34:02 PM
  
  Ivory wrote: Trying to put this in a tactful way, if you need that many minutes to come, I strongly doubt anyone will be able to get you off by sucking your dick. So, how long does it take normally for you to get a guy to cum by sucking his dick (trying to put it tactfully, of course)? There are different types of oral, too. Maybe I need deeper sucking and ball-licking i.e. more stimulation.

• What to do....? 8/30/2007 12:22:45 PM
  
  I tend to agree with your last point, RP. I think I've become accustomed to doing it a certain way, which is slow and sensual and I can only cum when my dick is ready and not a moment before. I've also myself tried jacking-off quickly if I find things not working but when I've done that, it's just left me breathless but it hasn't made any difference. It still deflated after a while. Eventually, if the situation was like that, I'd just stop and do it another time.

• What to do....? 8/29/2007 10:03:48 AM
  
  RandomPrecision wrote: Think back. Do you ever recall sex being portrayed by "normal folk" as anything other than evil? That's a guess. A good one but a guess, nonetheless. I don't recall anyone referring to it as 'evil' exactly, RP. Certainly many people are embarrassed to talk about it. I don't personally but I'm sure many do. It's certainly seen as a taboo by many 'normal folk' if it's used for anything other than procreation. But the thing is, I don't care what they think. The fact that for the entire time I had an erection proves that this wasn't a problem for me. I have a few theories of my own. 1) Usually when I jack-off to porn, the duration lasts between 90 and 120 mins, as I take breathers in between. This session w...

• Do many escorts let you come in their mouth 8/27/2007 5:24:55 PM
  
  lazenby wrote: Fausty wrote: Why would you want to nut in an escorts mouth? Do you think other guys have nutted in her mouth? 1? 10? 53? Well as a math professor I can calculate this exactly: (MORE NUT EJACULATED IN ESCORTS MOUTH) ----------> Leads straight to higher chance of STD. Or, Sperm + swallowing + multiple men + your cock = STD However most escorts have regular STD tests. Ask how many normals girls have had a STD test not many will have. More chance of getting a STD through a one night stand then with an escort. Quite right, lazenby. If it really was the case that escorts were so risky, by now many of them would have had their sites shut down and hounded into the middle of next week. Most would WANT to have regular STD tests, fo...