• profile

Recent Forum Posts

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/22/2016 11:50:54 PM
  
  pat362 wrote: Paddy82 wrote: ^Are you sure your brain doesn't allow you ? Let me make it simple. Sineplex = Legal Porno. It wasn't always the case because once upon a time there was a studio called Sineplex who produced a huge amount of movies that were at first only available on dvd and later on available both online and on dvd but the Recession did what it did to most porn studios and it killed the studio. Now I can't tell you if the owner of LP was also a partner in the Sineplex family of studios but it's irrelevant now because he owns that company. Any video now made under the banner Sineplex are really only shot for LP and that's why saying that Sineplex hasn't paid it's performers is BS because LP is Sineplex. If you want to go even ...

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/22/2016 6:36 PM
  
  Correct. My girlfriend has a membership but we share the cost (it's not cheap), and we're in agreement on this. The last scene purchased from that studio was the Angie Moon 4on1 which came out not long before Samantha took to twitter. I understand our actions are more damaging to LP than Sineplex, as they've already been payed for the content once it's on the site, but my hope is that others are doing the same and increasingly poor sales for that studio will force LP's hand on this... wishful thinking no doubt but we'll continue anyway.

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/22/2016 5:41:51 PM
  
  ^Are you sure your brain doesn't allow you ? The LP boss blames them because he had no control over their actions. He isn't involved in what they film, who they hire, what terms are being agreed upon with a model regarding scenes and payment, or how they conduct themselves when it comes to paying the women what they're owed. He just buys the end product to distribute on his site, and did so in this circumstance without knowing what was going on behind the scenes in Mexico. What I don't understand is why there's been no definitive action taken yet. If I was distributing for a studio that damaged my brand as badly as Sineplex has in the last few weeks, I would have cut them off already. I hope the wheels are in motion because the longer this ...

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 9/22/2016 3:56:45 PM
  
  You must be new to that forum That sort of topic is a common occurrence and has been happening for as long as I can remember. I've seen similar threads about Vinny, Tony Brooklyn, Erik Everhard, Jack Black, Mike Chapman, Markus Dupree, Nacho Vidal, Jon Jon, and so on. There is next to no moderation over there so you can imagine how toxic it can become. I wouldn't say a thread like that represents a big group of customers, it's the same handful of names stamping their feet and moaning until they get a response.

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/9/2016 9:03:25 AM
  
  I agree, that post is not an attempt to exclude what's owed to her, I'm merely stating the position the distributor is in with regard to the selling of the one scene on offer. There's been a lot of demanding that her scene gets taken down from the site, I'm trying to establish if she has in fact been payed for it. She's said more than once that she signed no paperwork on her trip, which absolutely baffles me; was everything agreed upon verbal ?

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/9/2016 8:49:43 AM
  
  PIERRE WOODMAN wrote: All right but LP don't have any shame to use video made with Samantha Rone with their logo on it and knowing she wasn't paid !!! And telling she does a problem for "nothing" is not acceptable IMHO ... PW The thing that hasn't been made clear yet and is still confusing to me, how many scenes did she shoot and what was her rate for each of them. I've seen pictures in Samantha's forum thread on LP that suggest she did two, and it's been established from the text message she showed on twitter that an agreement for two wire payments of $3500 will be sent for her work. If she did shoot two and the agreed upon fee for each was $3500, then she has been payed for the one scene they are currently selling.

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/8/2016 5:31:19 AM
  
  Reading that thread, it looks like he's taken exception to her stating specifically that LP refused to pay her. Samantha has said several times that she was told she won't be getting payed what's owed to her, and it should be noted that she's provided nothing to support that claim, in fact she's said more than once that there's been no contact over this. A week later and I've still seen no apology from Javier, no expanation for this fuck up or a promise to make it right. Don't go to Mexico.

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/7/2016 9:47:15 AM
  
  We can do this for as long as you like, Murdock, as I said previously, I find you amusing It's funny how Pierre didn't deny or reply to my post, but you felt the need to on his behalf, are you a shill ? And I agree with you Pierre, this should have been settled for her already, not just out of principle, but because $3500 is peanuts in the grand scheme of things.

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/7/2016 3:21 AM
  
  So when we had this exact same conversation regarding your use of the word "every", your defence was I was splitting hairs and pedantic, but you don't mind doing the same thing when supporting one of your own points ? Seen as you like my pedantry so much, Cindy said "he seems to want to paint" that picture, not that he is. And can you explain to me how that tweet is a misrepresentation of him, it's in direct response to performers pay on the day this was blowing up, and is a clear attempt to suggest that this has been happening for years in Europe, and that he's been trying to tell people but until it involved the US nobody cared. A couple things wrong with that: Not only is there not a single case, or even a rumor of performers having face...

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/7/2016 2:26:53 AM
  
  murdock wrote: At what point did Pierre say, state, imply, suggest, paint a picture, indicate, hint at, or put forth for consideration the idea that nobody (performing for... Siniplex? Legal Porno?) is being paid? <link>

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/6/2016 4:17:20 PM
  
  ^Fair enough I'll take that on board, but I still feel there's a self promoting aspect to that post that suggests personal involvement helped facilitate resolution.

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/6/2016 11:16:41 AM
  
  Does the post above not clearly state, in his own words, that because of his and Megan's actions, Legalporno took action ? So what did I say that needed moderating ?

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/6/2016 11:05:54 AM
  
  Can you please explain to me, Flash, what I said that warranted having my post deleted and cbeing alled an asshole ? Edited by - Paddy82 on 9/6/2016 11:06:28 AM

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/6/2016 10:49:10 AM
  
  MOD: Don't be an asshole. Edited by - flash on 9/6/2016 10:59:51 AM

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/6/2016 3:28:33 AM
  
  murdock wrote: Shit. I forgot to ask your permission to say all of that. My bad. I'll let it go this one time. If you're asking me why I didn't comment on Cindy's post, it's because what she said was the same impression I was under. I read about Megan being payed immediately, I didn't realise the same hadn't been done for Samantha until last night, and fanofman had already posted that here. This might surprise you but I think you're right about LP not looking for a longterm fix to this whole mess, and I'd be very surprised if this working relationship continues for much longer. Coming from someone who's spent a fair amount of time on the LP forum, the situation has been strained for a very long time between them.

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/5/2016 11:19:52 PM
  
  I like you, murdock, you amuse me. murdock wrote: I doubt the back and forth with KillBill or BlackSix will be the last. Someone else will mention it and you'll tell them how wrong they are about everything they said I will if it's conjecture spoken as fact, especially if I know it to be untrue or completely inaccurate. murdock wrote: you'll concede a point or two here and there, until we're back to basically admitting that's where the initial funding came from and probably still comes from, but no one should dare say that without having asked you permission first I guess? Is this a proposal, because I'd appreciate that, especially from you. murdock wrote: Yes, you did make a post where you were critical of LP. Good for you. Thank you. murd...

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/5/2016 4:26:42 AM
  
  1. My first post here was looking for feedback from American directors and agents, of which Pierre Woodman had openly stated he was at a dinner with recently and where the discussion of restricting models who had worked for LP from working in the US had been spoken about and agreed upon. I was seeking any feedback from those who I don't associate with complete bs, as to whether there was any legitimacy to his claims. Perhaps you didn't read it properly, but my motivations and interests were purely selfish, I was angry that a block had been put on some of my favourite European models potentially working for some of my favourite American companies. I wanted to know why a man who has absolutely nothing to do with that market, was involved in t...

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/5/2016 2:16:52 AM
  
  So you don't want to quote me on all the great things I've said about them ? [;)] And a comparison to Trump, I'm honored I think, that was a compliment, right ? murdock wrote: And your shilling for LP predates the Siniplex fiasco. The Siniplex fiasco just helped to magnify your "interest" in the company. Pure gold. All the Sineplex fiasco has done is lost a customer in me, and I'll be continuing to advise the models that I'm interested in to avoid them like the plague.

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/5/2016 1:47:43 AM
  
  Ahh yes, the go to response from someone who has nothing legitimate to say or contribute. If you spout nothing but conjecture and unsubstantiated rumor around here, it's fine, but if somebody who's been a fan of Sineplex since the early 2000's and subsequently LP dares to correct you on some of it, you must be an operative. I'm sure my bosses will be over the moon with me advising models not work for Sineplex and to avoid going to Mexico.

• When Will Legal Porno Cut Off Sineplex? (formerly 9/5/2016 12:57:57 AM
  
  murdock wrote: You're the one splitting hairs over the Siniplex mention, not me. She did in fact call out Siniplex in her tweets. That's what <link> is. It's Siniplex's twitter handle. (that's why when you go to the @FUNDSEX twitter page it says: "SINEPLEX Studio producing EPIC scenes check them out on Legalporno.com" and shows their location as Mexico. You continue to act like she flat out ignored Siniplex in her accusations and that couldn't be farther from the truth. Siniplex was named several times as the culprits. Furthermore, she was very clear to state that she's never had problems with Legal Porno and when she did identify the culprit by name it was Javier Vazquez, who last time I checked was the guy running Siniplex, not the guy r...