• profile

Recent Forum Posts

• The Ongoing Battle for Sexual Equality 4/8/2014 5:07:55 AM
  
  Although there is no doubt that women face more discrimination than men in terms of there sexual partners in life, the amount of reverse slut shaming I've seen in feminist sites like Jezebel, leaves me to believe that it's a more complicated thing that what some people discuss.

• Angela White Official Thread 4/8/2014 5:01:13 AM
  
  I don't normally post in the porn sections anymore but I have to say that I think Angela White is the hottest woman in porn. And I don't think it's even close. Her name is pretty big but I think she should be among the biggest names out there. When I followed her on twitter, I thought her number of followers didn't measure to her quality and it's still unexplainable to me.

• DOMA struck down 7/6/2013 2:38:59 PM
  
  Flash wrote: This is where this "discussion" is going. The only one who can follow the societal rules imposed on the situation is you. This x100. He can go all and pretend to be so offended by the discussion and how they respond to him but that is just hiding from the fact his argument is totally convenient and hypocritical.

• DOMA struck down 7/4/2013 2:32:57 AM
  
  realtip wrote: That's why when the world sucks, human beings who know better have to work even harder to change it from those who actually take pride in making it suck. That's what people are doing in defending homosexuals from hypocrites and homophobes like you.

• DOMA struck down 7/3/2013 10:38:53 AM
  
  ^ That's what I just said but I have to come up with new material apparently eventhough he keeps using the law as justification only when it applies to the people he believes should be oppressed. Which is conveniently not he and his ancestors.

• DOMA struck down 7/3/2013 3:54:34 AM
  
  ^ Look who's talking. Truth hurts doesn't it?

• DOMA struck down 7/3/2013 2:15:19 AM
  
  realtip wrote: For whatever reason, Massachusetts and a few other liberal states have changed their laws to redefine marriage to appease homosexuals. So according to their current law, it is true that it's now discrimination to deny same-sex "marriages" the same legal benefits of heterosexual marriages. What I am saying is that law should not be changed. Where the law remains the same, it is not discrimination. Maybe the way they change the interracial laws to appease blacks. But apparently the law wasn't the &quotof stone, can't be change, needed to be respected at all coast" thing that it is now when Martin Luther King and all those other black civil rights fighters were fighting them. Oh it was? Oh but it was realtip anc...

• DOMA struck down 7/1/2013 6:56:19 PM
  
  Flash wrote: One set of rules for those you are in favor of and another for those you hate. What's any different from what he has been spouting since that long "poor me" rant?

• DOMA struck down 6/28/2013 8:59:17 AM
  
  realtip wrote: ^Reading and comprehending are two different things. The former does not always lead to the latter. Obviously, the same thing goes for the difference between being right and being popular. I comprehended alright. I comprehend that you're a hypocrite who thinks he made this great point but is so clueless that you don't know you just proved everybody else right with that horrible defense. AGAIN.

• DOMA struck down 6/28/2013 2:48:25 AM
  
  realtip wrote: Yes, it is a long post. But if you can't take the time to actually read something, then you shouldn't comment on it. It exposes your ignorance. Who said I didn't read that pathetic excuse of a rationalization that only proved right everybody else on you. By the way I love how you keep talking about other people ignorance when you're the one constantly proving how ignorant and hypocritical a person you are. But keep telling your arguments about how you define oppression by how it affect you and your family. LOL

• DOMA struck down 6/28/2013 1:38:57 AM
  
  realtip wrote: Having to grow up as a child in society that mentally conditions you from birth to believe that you are inferior to others, that's oppression. HA HA HA HA What a crock of shit. (The whole post but especially this part). Congratulations on exposing your hypocrisy in one long post.

• DOMA struck down 6/27/2013 12:53:41 AM
  
  realtip wrote: People throw that word "oppression" around too easily these days. Just like marriage, it has lost its meaning. Of course they do. People should get the memo that it should only be used when it you the one being affected by it and not when you do it to others.

• DOMA struck down 6/27/2013 12:28:17 AM
  
  Smiler Grogan wrote: Why are such comparisons invalid? Because they aren't valid when he's the one oppressing and not the other way around.

• DOMA struck down 6/26/2013 11:37:16 PM
  
  realtip wrote: There is nothing hypocritical about the idea that the vote should be respected and upheld. That's the whole idea of democracy. What is hypocritical is saying that it's OK to invalidate the votes of citizens if you don't like the outcome, which is exactly what happened in this case. Yes there is. If people were voting for interracial marriage to be outlawed, you would be up in arms as with everything against THAT minority. But since it's oppressing another group individual rights that you're against, then it's all about the vote and how a majority vote should be respected on INDIVIDUAL rights. Hypocrite. Edited by - p3-2a on 6/26/2013 11:37:39 PM

• DOMA struck down 6/26/2013 10:43:15 PM
  
  realtip wrote: ^I'm just wondering how a court can overturn a democratically-held vote anyway. The issue of gay marriage was placed before the voters in California. They voted against it. That should have been the end of it, as it likely would have been had the vote gone the other way. How then can a court come along and say that those votes don't matter? So much for living in a democracy. But no one is talking about that. Like with Sexshopgirl, I love when hypocrites go and complain about being a minority when it's their case but have no qualms about oppressing when they are in the majority. Just shows the total hypocrisy of them. I just hope people remember when stuff about black oppression comes and this guy starts whining, how he has n...

• Explosion at Boston Marathon finish line 5/8/2013 12:08:29 PM
  
  the unknown pervert wrote: In the same way that obesity isn't tied to fast food. Some people can eat fast food and not get fat. Some people can get fat without eating fast food. However the odds suggest that it is more likely that if you eat enough fast food you are going to get fat. I think you would have a hard time convincing <link> that terrorism isn't tied to a religion. Of course the Amercian media is too busy covering Chris Christie's weight loss surgery to report on this. This is a terrible analogy. What percentage of terrorism is based on religious attacks? What defines a terrorist attack? How many people practice religion and are terrorism the same way fast food leads to obesity? That example in Syria isn't terrorist, it's just ...

• Explosion at Boston Marathon finish line 4/21/2013 10:46:43 PM
  
  ^ Bosch died in 2011.

• Explosion at Boston Marathon finish line 4/20/2013 9:15:53 PM
  
  Now that Americans are so against Terrorism maybe they can stop harboring Luis Posada Carriles and stop being hypocrites.

• Reparations 3/21/2013 12:16:12 PM
  
  ^ Come on Lindi. Isn't that part of the problem? I mean I agree with you about reparations but to me your answer about the native americans is part of why people feel this. The Indian injustices were great and it's no laughing matter and yet when I was a kid (and I'm not that old) it was still common practice to regard the indians as the bad guys and the cowboys as the heroes. Not up until recently has the tide changed and still it's not viewed as severely as it should. Same thing with reparations. As I've said before most of the times reparations is seen as some scam entitlement of black people. It's never seen for what it was :another giant screwjob to the slave population. Reparations are unfeasible now in every way (from where the money...

• Reparations 3/20/2013 12:19:17 AM
  
  Roads To Moscow wrote: BustdownGal, are Holocaust survivors (yes, there are some still alive) and their immediate family members owed reparations by the current German government? Awaiting your response... I think the problem is that why they might not be, it's a debatable answer and the majority wouldn't think it's out of place for them to ask for that. On the other hand when reparations is brought as a topic a lot of people treat it as a total scam and totally undeserved to even bring out the point when it's a similar if not worse experience.