• profile

Recent Forum Posts

• Luke Ford on Female Porn Directors 11/7/2005 11:05:11 PM
  
  Huggins293 wrote: I saw nothing in Luke's words to indicate "praise" of studly men. Luke's point seemed to be that men have more to lose from female promiscuity, as we lack the certainty that women have always had of who our children are. Ie, the double standard exists in reaction to a fundamental inequality in the reproductive process. It implies that male promiscuity should be less focused on. True, but you previously said "How can men who denigrate "whores" praise men for fucking tons of women?", and that's what I was replying to. Luke's suggestion that there is more of a reason for society to discourage promiscuity in women is a long way from saying it is a desirable characteristic in men. I don't think he...

• Shane Diesel has Rights 11/3/2005 7:59:37 PM
  
  Isabel_Ice wrote: I hate controversity...but.. Shane is such a good guy,,, I don't know Jessica. I can't belive he would put us at risk. Nieve or real... I refuse to look to the horrible side. If they are a couple, then as long as they are bein as safe as possible, who are we to judge.... It's just a step forward to breakinng down stigma barriers... don't cuss me if u don't agree.... "Safe as possible" with an infected partner is still a much greater risk than with the general population. The only way he isn't putting anyone at risk is if they're not having sex. I'm afraid that I do think you are being naive. Edited by - Orange Paddy on 11/3/2005 8:00:07 PM

• Shane Diesel has Rights 11/3/2005 7:38:43 PM
  
  Hell On Wheels wrote: Just what kind of sex is he having with Jessica? Hetero Female to male transmission of the virus during protected vaginal/oral intercourse (using appropriate lubrications with anti-viral properties) presents no more of a risk than fucking strangers in a bar... So a few simple precautions can reduce the risk of sex with a known carrier to lower than that of sex with a stranger (who statistically is very unlikely to be infected)? You're obviously an expert, so if you'll kindly explain the statistical analysis you performed to reach this conclusion, then I'll defer to your scientific knowledge.

• Shane Diesel has Rights 11/3/2005 6:43:01 PM
  
  Davy Wan Kenobi wrote: Do we even know for real that he has benn infected ? No one said that he had been infected yet, the point is that she is. If he is still with her, then it would be rather hard to believe that they're not having sex. This would put him at a considerable risk of becoming infected. When one half of a couple who regulary have sex is infected, even with condoms the cumulative risk of the other partner becoming infected builds up to a significant one over time. A risk that he would be passing on to those he works with, and in turn to the whole industry. "Hell on Wheels", your assertion that this is no greater risk than the general population is fundamentally wrong. It's a much greater risk. The outbreak that inf...

• Pornstar ID? 10/23/2005 12:12 AM
  
  If you're interested in Britney Spears lookalikes, then check out this girl Denise who was at Erotica LA and went to Porn Star Karaoke back in June: http://www.lukeisback.com/images/images/Img0102/DSC_0082.JPG Not heard of her actually appearing in anything yet though.

• Luke Ford on Female Porn Directors 10/21/2005 9:03 PM
  
  Huggins293 wrote: "It's for a good reason that society uses the word "whore" as its greatest denigration of women. Civilization must watch over women's sexuality (and yes, use a double standard) so men can know who their children are (and thus be more likely to stay around to raise them)." IN my opinion, the double standard makes no fucking sense. A guy who sleeps with many women has the same sexual lifestyle a whore has. How can men who denigrate "whores" praise men for fucking tons of women? Isn't this a bit of a straw man? I saw nothing in Luke's words to indicate "praise" of studly men. Luke's point seemed to be that men have more to lose from female promiscuity, as we lack the certainty that wom...

• M$ IE: PWNED, again! 10/21/2005 4:59 AM
  
  jamesn wrote: lol, that doesn't mean i USE internet explorer, just reminding people that rust and black hats never sleep. in fairness, the majority of ff exploits are more theoretical than practical threats. but they exist, i've also noticed a few sites with a fairly-technical userbase likely to use ff or the suite are starting to work ads in designed around the browser. The important thing for me is that they fix them quickly, rather than trying to cover them up.