• profile

Recent Forum Posts

• Jules Jordan Aspect Ratio of his Scenes 12/11/2017 4:39:08 PM
  
  NotMyRealName wrote: I've noticed the same thing with what appears to be some vertical stretching. My theory is that he's capturing the scene in DCI 4k (which is a tiny bit wider) and then converting to UHD for release. This would would leave the vertical the same while compacting the horizontal. I think this happened when he first started shooting/releasing 4K, but not for the last year or more. Actually, the "4K" releases were kept at their native resolutions/aspect ratio while everything else was 16:9. Taking a quick glance at the trailer and Riley's full scene, it might just be the effect of getting a bit too close with whatever lens is being used.

• Blacked.com Official Thread 8/19/2017 2:01:42 PM
  
  ^^ Well, like most scenes/films, the trailer should be captivating - so if that doesn't move you... Also, "cameraguy" makes almost as many appearances here as Kendra Sunderland's bf did in her showcase scenes. What did Lansky say about his "borderline unhealthy level of perfectionism and attention to details"? Should I assume his presence was intentional? Just scanning through the scene and I noticed some strange cam angles, distancing and shots of nothing interesting during the action. As for Sloan, she looks nice here in comparison to the other bits I've seen of her. Seems like another annoying fake screamer though - and saying "I can't believe you're gonna make me cum again," doesn't quite work when I didn't believe the first time was ge...

• Blacked.com Official Thread 8/3/2017 8:14:35 AM
  
  Silversurfer12 wrote: No one's excited about tasha reign? Not really excited. Another who appeared too calculating to actually deliver a memorable performance. Will watch to see how she is now she's a bit older/more experienced. Gonna watch the trailer to see if she takes more than 2 inches of Mandingo's dick in her mouth... ... ... oh well!

• Blacked.com Official Thread 8/1/2017 1:12:39 PM
  
  ^ It's not the general idea of the spoken intro, but the fact that when it's obviously being read, it can remind me of teaching English to 7 year olds. Not the ideal preparation for...well...errr... I've actually burst out laughing sometimes. Maybe there is some humour on the site after all.

• Blacked.com Official Thread 8/1/2017 8:48:01 AM
  
  DVDstuff wrote: Gore Gore Girl wrote: misspornUSA wrote: SirJerksAlot wrote: That is something I have never, ever seen in a porn before, because this is supposed to be fucking, not scripted acting! Is it? Maybe Greg doesn't share your opinion. Indeed. Makes me wonder what some people think they're watching... In other news, this complaint makes me consider renewing my subscription. Yeah, some folks really need to understand they're not judging porn acting for an Oscar. I'd say there is a problem is when the (lack of) ability to deliver lines and "act" actually distracts and detracts from the purpose of the product. I honestly can't think of too many scenes across the Lansky network where the elements have just worked and the end result has...

• Blacked.com Official Thread 7/22/2017 1:57:37 PM
  
  ^ Let's not forget Kendra's last name either...

• Tushy.com Official Thread 6/7/2017 5:16:05 PM
  
  LambChop001 wrote: IMO Lana's showcase was the best of the three so far. I have a feeling you like the dead fish type lol shows how different views are. I like Eva's looks, that bum is just too hot. But I didn't like Eva's first scene she seems not to like anal, and has no dirty talk....a real dead fish type. I like Lana's scenes, she checks all the boxes for me. Must be why all her scenes on Greg's & other websites are among the highest rated. Her showcase also rated better than Riley's. lol I hope Greg has her back soon! I want to see Lana 1 on 1 with manual. That is pretty much what I was saying about Eva's scenes. Not quite a dead fish. More of a "I'm a professional, this is my job and I shouldn't look like I'm enjoying it too much bec...

• Tushy.com Official Thread 6/7/2017 8:34:27 AM
  
  FlacFan wrote: ^ 1} Because he books girls we like for 1st's, We watch in the (obviously futile) hope that this on will be different. Using your logic, we shouldn't watch his scenes even if it our all-time favorite girl. 2} We comment here because - See #1. 3} It isn't wrong to be pissed off that a girl you likes 1st {insert act here}scene be enjoyable. To me this was not enjoyable. And commenting like this in a performers thread is suicidal. #1 - For me, it's not necessarily even about firsts, and there's never the hope or expectation of seeing something that breaks the Lansky mold (I think I'll leave that typing error uncorrected). When it comes to the point where the director and/or performers kill something that should be memorable, I ...

• Tushy.com Official Thread 6/7/2017 8:02:24 AM
  
  aclayfan wrote: Lansky's getting the same criticisms here that he got when directing the We Live Together scenes for RK. The thing is his formula of attractive women and quality camera work is making him successful. Why would he mess with that? Well that's interesting, because seeing some of his WLT stuff was probably the first time I actively tried to find out who directed some scenes. There's a certain ... fluidity or organic feel that's missing from most of his current releases. "B-T-V" seems to be somewhat overdirected - and then chopped up in the edit - all to achieve a certain product that has become rather.....(I actually think "tasteless" in all senses of the word sums up my current opinion). I suppose working with a certain vision...

• Tushy.com Official Thread 6/6/2017 11:16:46 PM
  
  ^ About Lana: - Hype has been ridiculous. She's okay but still relatively new and appears to have an "I'm a pornstar and I have to talk/act/perform in a certain way which comes across in most things I've seen and read from her. Tends to make her scenes seem fake/cold/forced. Only the hype made her "suitable" for a showcase. I found Kendra Sunderland's scenes to be more watchable. About Eva: - Just needs to relax, let herself go and enjoy it - if she can. I'm sure she's shot with Adriano and Mason before - exactly the same result from memory. About Lansky: - I don't think the look/style has been anything unique or innovative at any point across the 3 sites. Other sites have done it better in terms of overall look and feel, etc.. Some of his...

• Tushy.com Official Thread 6/6/2017 4:29:09 PM
  
  FlacFan wrote: Eva's scene bored me... Sadly a rather predicatable outcome given the people involved. Eva's "performances" are generally reserved - almost to the point of killing any heat the scene could have. Lansky's production/editing can sometimes suck any passion/eroticism out of a scene. JVJ...is just a functional dick - my gf loves him to bits but I think the glass dildo Eva used in her FTV scene from way back when looked and performed much better. FlacFan wrote: It was a Lana re-run, as was Lana's a Riley Re-run Kinda. Not gonna examine it too much, but the character of the "stars" makes a difference. Are you saying they were ALL boring or that Lansky really needs to lose his cookie cutter AND his memory of the last 3 years?

• Vixen.com Official Thread 8/2/2016 10:26:45 AM
  
  Pitbull67 wrote: Joined Vixen straight away just on the strength of the Leah Gotti scene. Really disappointed to find a 'distortion' line running across the screen for around 28 minutes. From the comments seems like everyone else is having the same problem but several days on and no fix. Hope this isn't a sign of one site too far with quality sacrificed to get it up and running. Quite a few releases have been "glitchy" on the Lansky sites. Given the relative low frequency of releases compared to some other sites, and that (to my knowledge) errors have not been rectified, this has been disappointing. Recently, Blacked (Marley Brinx) had random blocks/artifacts throughout. Adria/Ariana scene had your "distortion lines" during the intro/recap...

• Alex Grey's Official Thread 7/2/2016 1:06:41 PM
  
  ^, ^^, ^^^, etc. "1080p HD" versions may be available on the site, but they are encoded so poorly (low bitrate) that it's almost ridiculous. I know there's a quality/bandwidth trade off, but I always wonder if site owners actually watch their own output.