• profile

Recent Forum Posts

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 2/17/2022 10:27:49 AM
  
  GONZO has always been accused of a lack of work ethic. Accused by the biggest liar in the industry and disproved in court and by the police.

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 2/2/2022 1:37:11 PM
  
  gooch wrote: ^ Are you familiar with “prolapses”? It’s a legit medical condition, one that women would normally be at risk for in the elder years, if they ever get it at all. There used to even be small infomercials for women who suffered pelvic floor collapse, prolapse, regarding seeking help in dealing with it. What you see when you see women pushing their assholes outside of their body, or the insides of their vaginal walls, those are prolapses. It gets worse as time goes on, becoming easier and easier for the prolapse to take place. Eventually the woman, if she’s performing on camera but not at a hardcore company, if she’s on screen and has to cough or grunt, she’ll have to reach back and press on her asshole to keep if from falling ou...

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 6/16/2021 7:22:05 AM
  
  Freeloaders don't know about these features. But they sure know how to complain.

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 6/13/2021 10:43:02 AM
  
  Some MYTHS found in the previous posts : - LP/AV is a studio. - LP/AV only publishes extreme content - "anal is [...] very difficult [even] for experienced performers" - new releases page has an abundance of prolapse / all studios are obsessed with prolapse - models needs to shoot soft porn for as long as possible to be successful - models who shoot hard content are not hired by other studios

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 3/22/2021 11:00:50 AM
  
  How many times will the mods let him deflect extremely serious accusations with pages of screenshots of something that's not relevant? He says he doesn't want to waste his time defending himself about pedophilia accusations yet he is fine spending his time writing shit on forums all day every day and suing for a couple screenshots? How fucking dumb does one have to be to not see through his lies? What the hell is he even doing in this thread? It was demonstrated times and times that he is a huge liar. Why is his pollution tolerated?

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 3/22/2021 10:49:58 AM
  
  STFU you lying sack of shit. And you don't even care about the posts about your wife. No one who really cares would post again this stuff over and over with screenshots like you do. You don't even know what empathy is. Edited by - LegalPorno on 3/22/2021 10:50:43 AM

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 3/20/2021 11:01:51 AM
  
  You've got to appreciate the irony of having an actual woman abuser, underage lover and real trafficker (sending models to get fucked in Paris) writing about this. He will never sue us for those extreme accusations because he can't. It's all true, contrary to his gross lies. Take note that WE are suing him for his lies. He isn't suing us for any alleged lies. We never made any post about his family by the way but he does this all the time in his trash forum.

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 3/2/2021 11:41:25 AM
  
  Shystie wrote: @Legalporno Are there any plans to revive American Anal or replace them in the future? I know Charlie is retired now but maybe use Disciples of Desire or get a new IR duo? We have asked him to shoot a lot more scenes but he seems to be busy working for his usual clients, and virus is not helping.

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 3/2/2021 11:40:05 AM
  
  WildeMan wrote: LegalPorno is correct in that the New York Times is no longer what it was and the feud with Woodman is well known and predates the doxing of his family. I'm sure neither party is perfect, but Woodman, even in this thread, is implying and making inaccurate statements. I don't believe LegalPorno/Analvids is blameless or has never had any of their studios do anything shady, but their statements have been more concrete and have less obvious manipulation. I enjoy both of your products. While you're here: please shoot some /more IR gangbangs, thanks. We have only one anal studio. Our policy for testing there is still to this day the strictest in Europe (weekly testing) and has been like this for years (long before others d...

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 2/28/2021 5:39:56 PM
  
  While we are at it, wanna hear a joke? What do the Woodman "secret ancient Chinese anal preparation" and the Coca-Cola recipe have in common? They both used cocaine at some point in their formula. Edited by - LegalPorno on 2/28/2021 5:40:30 PM

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 2/28/2021 5:37:32 PM
  
  By the way if you want to see some ideas on the state of journalism and why the New York Times is trash propaganda, here is a video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqLX61Ut1c8

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 2/28/2021 5:33:49 PM
  
  Take a moment to read what the top Hungarian agent wrote about Woodman some 10 YEARS AGO already, and that HE WOULD BE IN JAIL if he lived in the US : https://imgur.com/a/ZrDqtiX Of course back then he was also a big liar, as much as today and everyone in the industry knows it. Notice the part where she writes about "the KEY IN THE LOCK"? That was one of his earliest lies and attacks against us, which really made no sense to us back then. He was claiming that we were locking up models until they would do their scenes, when in reality that's what HE was doing back then, and probably for many years after that too. Now remember how those clown journalists wrote that Woodman never had any fight with other people in the industry before us....

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 2/28/2021 5:28:40 PM
  
  Listen, we do NOT condone the posting and involvement of family, girlfriends, and especially kids. I have personally deleted a bunch of those posts. But what about you Pierre? You and your fake accounts have countless trash posts of the same kind and that is why those people (REAL users by the way - not fake accounts like you love to do) wanted to give you a taste of your own medicine. With that said it is still distasteful. You and those idiot journalists are trying so very hard to build up the FAKE STORY that you attacked us relentlessly because of those posts when your one sided war started LONG BEFORE THAT, SOME 10 YEARS AGO. They need this fake narrative because it is obvious their main source of information has no credibility, but...

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 2/28/2021 10:46:05 AM
  
  PIERRE WOODMAN wrote: Bunch of crap and lies. No one said anything when we changed DDF Network to Porn World. Same thing for LP to Anal Vids. We upgrade to better names. And if you disagree we really don't care. - Do you want to tell us how many girls complained to the police about you in your career? Many. You are open to authorities about your work you say? What about telling them about the underage girls you published? We have accused you several times of fucking minors on camera and releasing the clips yet you're not suing us but such an honest and "very correct" man as yourself should want to clear his good name, right? - Do you want to tell us how much you paid those girls to make fake testimonies against us? What he won't tell...

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 2/18/2021 9:04:28 PM
  
  pat362 wrote: I also call B.S on all the LP post. No business who has name recognition changes that name unless they feel they need. I could speculate as to why they felt they had to change their name but that would be me basically guessing. I suspect time will tell why they did it. I call BS on all your posts too. This thread is filled with your nasty yet totally uninformed comments about us. I thought you had finally become slightly more objective as of late but apparently not. If you had taken the time to read my post above as well as our forum you would have seen exactly why we changed domain name, as it was discussed at length already, and long before this smear campaign. Woodman as well as these fake reporters have been trying to ...

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 2/18/2021 11:16:12 AM
  
  PIERRE WOODMAN wrote: why do they need change their name ??? good question too ... ) The name change was announced early last year and you know that very well. Internally it was prioritized early January (was placed at the top of the list). But maybe you should listen to these propagandists. They have no hidden intentions, right?

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 2/18/2021 10:30:21 AM
  
  PIERRE WOODMAN wrote: I'm surprise nobody said the Covid 19 pandemic is the fault of Woodman or it's a Woodman lie ... I never lied about Legal Porno and there was already various burning articles about them in press ( BTW they changed the name and from today they are AnalVids. Why do they need change their name ??? good question too ... ) Anyway Nick Khristof is american and works for the New York Times so maybe he is also spreading fake news ... what do you think ??? Soon more things will come and world will know I was always right about them ... <image> PW The ever lying Pierre Woodman... What he doesn't tell you is that HE provided those fake Czech journalists with the juicy fake information they were desperately looking for. ...

• AnalVids (formerly Legal Porno) thoughts? 2/18/2021 10:22:55 AM
  
  gooch wrote: InstantClassic wrote: pat362 wrote: It's also important to mention that the owners are being investigated in more than one Country so that may affect how they do business. Okay, I didn't know that either. Every now and then you read something in their forum about similar stories, which are then quickly dismissed as "Pierre Woodman lies". Interesting. I'm going to have to look around and find out more about this. Anybody have any further information? You can read our response here : https://www.analvids.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=96&t=30422