• profile

Recent Forum Posts

• Emily Willis 3/1/2025 5:39:31 PM
  
  I can't be the only one who will admit that it sort of adds an element of further taboo of it all...

• A.I. Porn? WTF!?! 2/18/2025 3:00:46 PM
  
  RelentlessOnanism wrote: ^While there are women who are prepared to have sex on camera, there will always be 'proper' porn, but the deepfake stuff is likely to blow up out of all proportion. Presumably, zero celebs are going to sanction the official use of their images, so it will all be illegal, dark web stuff. But I assume it will be unbelievably popular. Hell, one day you'll be able to generate porn scenes featuring that girl at work you really fancy too. I don't know about full generation, but the ability to do deepfakes and superimpose a face has been around for a little while already. Hell I remember a few years back you could upload the image of someone's face, and it would scan its database of pornstars and give you the best "match...

• Three major problems with today's porn 2/18/2025 2:47:58 PM
  
  Lezzyist wrote: ^One of my pet peeves with porn is that almost nowhere is the content about realism and sex. Apparently, people will not pay attention if the performers are not hamming it up in a corny way. I agree it can sometimes get a little over the top, but this is also media and entertainment and fantasy. I don't want to watch a movie about a regular dude who goes to his accounting job and has small talk with his coworkers and then goes home and cooks himself dinner before reading a book and going to sleep. I want to watch something (porn or otherwise) that has a little more extreme, interesting, and yes even unrealistic aspects. I am married and can basically have "real" sex anytime I want. I go to porn for the stuff that I know is ...

• Things You Wouldn't mind seeing LESS of! 2/18/2025 2:41:52 PM
  
  Adding to the list: Scissoring. I guess most other dudes are accustomed to convincing themselves the women in porn are having orgasms caused by absolutely nothing, but the scissoring really does jump the shark. You can literally see the women not touching each other as they loudly "cum" from visibly *not* touching vulva-to-vulva. It's some of the dumbest shit I've ever seen. "Scissor me timbers, Xerxes!" I seriously wonder how much that episode played into the public's imagination of how lesbians interact sexually with one another.

• Who Would You Like To See Come Out Of Retirement? 2/18/2025 2:36:48 PM
  
  I'm curious how everyone is interpreting this question. Are you assuming they are their real age today or basically starting back in the business the same age they left. There are some older legends who are probably close to 45 or 50 now that I honestly probably wouldn't be super interested in seeing today, but if they were still 20 or 25 like when they retired, I'd be interested.

• Things You Wouldn't mind seeing LESS of! 2/14/2025 2:27:19 PM
  
  Fake cum and/or orgasms from the male. I can't say for sure but it seems to be more common these days. Sometimes I just can't unsee it when the camera is focused on the penetration, then pans to only the woman's face for 60 seconds, then back to the penetration where the guy "cums" but you don't really see any intense muscular contractions happening or anything, and he pulls out to reveal a bunch of goo that looks more like cinnamon roll glaze than real semen, and then you realize why the camera panned away for the last 60 seconds of penetration, because the male talent had subtlety pulled out while he or some crew member injected the fake cum into the woman and then he reinserts for one or two thrusts before acting like he's cumming. I've...

• Websites not offering trailers now? 2/14/2025 2:05:16 PM
  
  I've noticed this too, and it's been better for my wallet. I tend to be an impulse buyer when it comes to studio subscriptions. One or two "need to have" scenes and I'm signed up for at least a month. But now that I can't even browse the recently released or upcoming scenes on some of these sites, I've stopped even visiting them.

• is VR dead? 2/2/2025 10:03:12 PM
  
  I guess I was referring to 3D more for just the non-pov type stuff. Personally I really only consider it "VR" if it's in POV. I've seen a few "VR" scenes that aren't POV and are essentially just regular camera angles but shot with a VR camera so the action has depth. I am probably using those terms wrong though.

• What ever happened to Anal Creampies? 2/2/2025 10:00:32 PM
  
  Not 100% on topic but I've been seeing way too many fake creampies lately. Personally I think that's 1 hex worse than just doing a money shot. Personally I like to see anal fucking > big gape > anal fucking until ejaculation > creampie. No scene cuts. No panning the camera away from the penetration to focus on the girls face while a crew member injects her ass with fake semen, just to go back to the penetration for the guy to have a fake orgasm and act like the donut glaze spilling out of her ass is actually his own cum. I've even seen male performers go so far as to inject their own urethra with fake semen. Absurd.

• is VR dead? 2/1/2025 10:34:58 PM
  
  Lurker01 wrote: Lexifan99 wrote: not to mention vr can only involve Porn stars who have been shooting within the last 10 years. if i want to watch a Porn star from 15 or 20 years ago in vr it is impossible. so you are limited to very current performers only. which is another huge drawback for my personal tastes. I am hoping AI fixes this for us. Honestly, it would be such a boon to older performers. Can you imagine them being able to release new scenes starring their younger selves? I'm looking forward to things like: AI, give me this VR scene but make it star Ginger Lynn when she was 20 AI, give me the Gauge scene from Perverted Point Of View but make it true VR I think I mentioned this on another post in this forum, maybe it was Reddit....

• Three major problems with today's porn 1/28/2025 9:56:30 PM
  
  I never thought I'd see so many social justice warriors bringing their Huffington Post and Tumblr shit ideas into a porn forum. That being said: I hate how fake porn is today, especially male orgasms. I don't know if it's a truely growing issue or if it just seems like it. Tons of scene cuts, fake cum, fake orgasms (sometimes from the men too). I love scenes like Manuel's Raw series, where it's just him, a woman, and a high quality camera. The camera work isn't the best but the 30-60 minute scenes are almost entirely unbroken and just him switching back from third person to POV. I want to know that the scene I'm watching is very close to the experience the actors are having. Too much camera work or editing breaks the immersion for me. I've...

• is VR dead? 1/28/2025 9:20:55 PM
  
  I don't think it's dead. I think it's just limited and has a limited audience. VR specific sites like POVR and SexLikeReal are still making or hosting a bunch of videos coming out each week. But VR is tricky for a whole host of reasons from both the consumer and producer. From the ones producing it (This is mostly focused around professional grade B/G scenes): Positions are limited, especially when sticking to POV style. There are just a lot of positions that don't look great when in VR, whereas positions like spooning can still show a lot of action in 2D porn. Scene cuts for breaks, repositioning, "fluffing", water, lube, etc. all become harder to pull off when the viewer is expecting a long continuous and immersive experience. I feel ...

• Scenes when the girl is too much for him to handle 1/15/2025 1:45:37 PM
  
  I'm genuinely surprised how many people have mentioned a Mike Adriano scene. Half the time it seems like he has to fake his orgasm inside a girls mouth or he claims he cream pied the woman, but it's either the weakest load ever or clearly just lube. As a long time fanatic, it really seems like he struggles a lot more with orgasms these days than 10 or 15 years ago. That being said, there is at least one scene I know where he does actually pop early with Kristina Rose in "Up Her Asshole #2" from 2012.

• Incest scenes with BIOLOGICAL sisters 1/5/2025 11:43:35 PM
  
  Not uncommon these days. Especially when there is such low supply of what you are offering.

• Incest scenes with BIOLOGICAL sisters 1/5/2025 8:20:30 PM
  
  There are two 19 year old identical twins with the Instagram handle "themaytwins". Names are Milani May and Miami May. Their Instagram content is expectedly pretty PG-13, but they have an OF account together that apparently is much more sexual. Haven't subscribed so I can't say how the content is.

• Emily Willis 11/23/2024 4:23:58 PM
  
  Secret Guy wrote: I would just like to ask. Does anybody here still rewatch Emily's scenes, despite her current condition, or is it bad taste? Personally I still watch them and I think in a taboo kind of way I think it adds to the experience. But I can see why that's not for everyone.

• Merge Video Clips into one video 10/4/2024 2:35:48 PM
  
  LosslessCut is great for this. I use it for trimming the parts of the video I don't care for too, to keep the file size smaller. It's great because it truly just cuts and splices the video clips together instead of re-rendering the whole thing like many software tools do.

• Onlyfans is terrible, why do people like it? 3/8/2024 2:01:38 PM
  
  Pornstars are generally decent looking, but in my opinion, very few are even a 8/10 so to speak. I personally find many instagram "models" or "influencers" to be way more attractive than even many of the best looking mainstream pornstars. And while bikini pics in Dubai and squats in Gymshark leggings are great, its also nice to see some nudity or sexual penetration too, hence why most of us are here. OnlyFans is the best place to find some of those super attractive and fit women doing those things.

• Emily Willis 3/8/2024 1:56:19 PM
  
  MOD: Congrats for winning the douchebag of the month contest. Enjoy your all expense paid 6 month vacation! Edited by - Flash on 3/8/2024 4:51:13 PM

• A.I. Porn? WTF!?! 2/21/2024 11:08:05 AM
  
  Some of the still images of AI generated influencers on instagram are crazy. Super hot and consistent and it can be really difficult to realize you aren't even looking at the face and body of a real person who exists. I know video will be a whole different ballgame with a lot of added complexity, but it's really incredible what AI can do these days. Soon we'll see a world where the hottest girls are doing the nastiest stuff and you won't even be able to tell the difference. Or you can plug and play different models in different scenes. It will be interesting to see the regulation around this space. What will be allowed? Who determines what a bunch of pixels is allowed to portray if there were no actual victims in a crime? Is it illegal for ...