• profile

Recent Forum Posts

• Studios and Cameras ? 3/6/2000 2:40 PM
  
  I'm glad to hear that I am not the only one who feels this way. I suppose that a large part of it is influenced by personal tastes. I guess that it's my taste to prefer a sharper image. I imagine that also people have different priorities. My top 2 are tied being actress looks and image quality. I'll probably stay away from Vivid for now unless thay change their ways. I only own 1 DVD and don't plan on buying very many in the future (too darn expensive). My next purchases will be Satyr (curious to see Chloe in action) and perhaps a Virtual Sex title. Thanks for the input guys. -Far P.S. If this message appears twice please excuse me (browser trouble).

• Studios and Cameras ? 3/5/2000 9:05 PM
  
  Call me silly, but an important part of a adult title is the quality of the camera. That being said it seems that Vivid , while having some good looking talent, uses HORRIBLE camera's that make the whole production look poor. Even their only DVD I own (Stiletto - yes a mistake but I was new to this at the time) looks horrible. Now to the contrary, Wicked, sems to use better equiptment. It's not the best possible I'm sure, but it is better and for me it makes a difference. Not as soft (washed out) as a Vivid title. What strikes me as odd is that reviewers never seem to mention this in a review. Is it that all Vivid titles are crappy in this way and that all Wicked productions are a bit better ? I may be out of line with all of this. I on...