• profile

Recent Forum Posts

• The Abortion Thread 7/7/2024 7:17:14 AM
  
  Cody McLarge wrote: Rapes, of all kinds, that result in a pregnancy account for less than .001% of rapes and abortions. I'd rather just let my taxes pay for .001% of abortions rather than pay for any more. Then again, I'd rather fully restrict all funding for Planned Parenthood and like clinics entirely, but this wasn't a bad compromise. And as I recall, Blunt and Akin pushed the "define rape" message, and Cantor and Boehner tossed them under the bus. Ah, Missouri... rape means not giving ones, consent period

• The Supreme Court 7/6/2024 2:14:22 PM
  
  Hardware wrote: I appreciate the sentiment, but I doubt that she stands a snowball's chance in hell of succeeding. going to be a messy 2025

• The Supreme Court 7/6/2024 2:11:09 PM
  
  they are not trying to hide their corruption

• The Supreme Court 7/6/2024 2:08:09 PM
  
  Hardware wrote: I seet that the Suparemes struck down the law banning bumb-stocks, at the same time guns are prohibited inside the Supreme Court. Again, one set of law for members of the Supreme Court, another for everybody else. they've lost all credibilty

• The Supreme Court 7/6/2024 9:25:08 AM
  
  Hardware wrote: I appreciate the sentiment, but I doubt that she stands a snowball's chance in hell of succeeding. the dems has to get down and dirty like the republicans

• The Supreme Court 7/6/2024 9:20:54 AM
  
  Hardware wrote: I appreciate the sentiment, but I doubt that she stands a snowball's chance in hell of succeeding. [/quote she has a good chance

• The Supreme Court 7/6/2024 8:47:44 AM
  
  FlacFan wrote: <link> The president also dismissed Ginsburg’s dying wish, as dictated to her granddaughter, that she “will not be replaced until a new president is installed.” “I don’t know that she said that,” Trump said on “Fox & Friends,” adding that he would be “more inclined” to believe it was “written out” by congressional Democrats.“ I Hate You. Edited by - FlacFan on 9/21/2020 12:22:16 PM that's the only way, pack the courts

• The Supreme Court 7/6/2024 7:21:16 AM
  
  Smiler Grogan wrote: <image> <image> term limits are the only way

• The Supreme Court 7/6/2024 7:14:49 AM
  
  aclayfan wrote: ^ Law originally did not apply to bump stocks. Trump administration tried to do end run around law & ban bump stocks. Court ruled power belongs to Congress to pass law banning bump stocks. Decision revolved around separation of power among the government branches, nothing else. all of their decision do not benefit we the people

• The Supreme Court 7/6/2024 7:10:13 AM
  
  Hardware wrote: Thing is, the opposition will consider it performative garbage, and a license for them to operate in the same vein. How does that help us? Perhaps we should put our emphasis on more democratic (small d) participation, because that is what encourages compromise. We, the People aren't winning when we allow political hacks to distract and divide us with petty squabbles. They aren't doing it for our benefit, that's for sure. there's going to be a lot of changes in the supreme court term limits are about to come about they will soon be voted into the seat, by voters

• The Supreme Court 7/5/2024 2:06 PM
  
  bridge6296 wrote: Lindsay already said that Trump should get to pick RBG's replacement. It was because the Democrats were mean to Kavannaugh during his confirmation. i use to have some trust in the supreme court, but not now

• The Nonsense Thread 7/5/2024 10:47:12 AM
  
  i have no idea what i'm doing

• Project 2025 could outlaw Porn all over U.S. 7/5/2024 10:41:22 AM
  
  project 2025 is going to effect all lively hood

• The Nonsense Thread 7/5/2024 10:35:25 AM
  
  just trying to figuer out how to navigate board

• The Nonsense Thread 7/5/2024 10:30:56 AM
  
  Lost Horizon wrote: threesomebody wrote: For a minute I couldn't locate the Nonsense Thread and I got so scared. It's that one with all the page numbers after it. You really shouldn't be able to miss it. it seems pretty serious

• Project 2025 could outlaw Porn all over U.S. 7/5/2024 10:28:20 AM
  
  rearadmiral wrote: I'll weigh in more when I have more time, but in other modern democracies, the courts are intended to limit the ability of a government to trample the rights of the citizens, but in the case of the US, the Supreme Court, and many lower courts, as openly partisan and are doing the bidding of the people who want to bring about Project 2025.