• profile

Recent Forum Posts

• Porn is totally fake! 6/10/2012 11:33:22 AM
  
  ... They are so sure about it that they even compared porn to the entertainment wrestling (WWE) to make their point and said that the actions are simulated and nothing performed is for real. ... That is absolutely the best analogy I've ever heard. Choreographed mayhem vs choreographed sex action. The videos of the 80s may have had more better performed/directed productions which made it easier for a viewer to fantasize, but that's about it. As with the wrestlers, sometimes the fake moves require some degree of realism (and may even cause injury) but it's all for the sake of convincing entertainment. Maybe that's why the majority of women find porn videos "boring" as opposed to real sex. While listening to them I was laughing my a...

• Serious Question: WHERE do these girls come from? 5/29/2012 4:13:31 PM
  
  Dan wrote: Recent scientific studies have found that most of women fantasize about being sexually irresistible to many guys. Most women either secretly or not so secretly want to arouse many guys with their sexy appearance and have the horny guys stroke their dicks secretly or not so secretly to make their day. What studies, when, where? Who was studied? I think the explanation is simple. They do it for the money. Fantasizing about being sexually irresistible, whether it's women or men is a long way from appearing on "Backroom Casting Couch"

• does anybody miss... 4/23/2011 11:48:08 AM
  
  Macko69 wrote: ... One thing I don't like as much today is that much of the porn produced today has an undercurrent of misogyny. Making a woman gag on a dick until she pukes. Slapping a woman's tits hard. Spitting in a woman's face. These kinds of things weren't very frequent back in the 80s. But then again, there wasn't nearly as much variety in porn back then. I tend to agree, however it is my impression, from what I have seen (re-releases on DVD), that some of the big stars of the 80's like Jamie Gillis and John Leslie were true misogynists and had no problem with 'acting' in those roles. Possibly just the opposite (toning it down). For me, the indication is in the facial expressions. A lesson that was reinforced by watching the TV hit ...

• FFM 3somes where only 1 of the girls gets fucked 1/20/2011 9:55:08 PM
  
  Rare occurrence, but it makes for a very erotic scene. G/G/B where one of the Gs participates as a 'helper' (not a watcher). Sometimes the B selects the wrong G.

• Creepiest male (mainstream) XXX performer? 9/2/2010 1:05:36 PM
  
  Asmodeus wrote: ..., by all accounts that I've read over the years everyone who ever knew and worked with the late Jamie Gillis have said what a nice guy he was in real life and I've haven't seen anything credible to the contrary. ...M "I know his friends and family love him and all, but I experienced him as, frankly, a jerk who enjoyed pushing limits to the point of inducing really unpleasant feelings in the women with whom he worked. I've called him the original sick puppy, one of the 3 most jaded people I ever worked with in this business, and that's saying a lot." Nina Hartley 02-21-2010

• Creepiest male (mainstream) XXX performer? 9/1/2010 9:56:16 PM
  
  Gore Gore Girl wrote: Rosco Fuji wrote: Jamie Gillis is very creepy, but in a good sort of way. He brought a lot to his scenes with his actual acting ability. Agreed. I guess there are two ways to answer this question: a) creepy, as in the person seems creepy in real life, and therefore undesirable in the scene, or b) plays creepy roles and does it really well (a la Jamie Gillis), and therefore super cool (depending on how you watch porn). I've been reading 'The Forum' for a while. This is my first post. Since Jamie Gillis is such a good actor, how would anyone one know when he was acting and when wasn't? Maybe his 'good guy' was an act and being a creep wasn't an act at all.