Good cinematography in porn means bad sex. Maybe this is because the sex looses all spontaneity when they try to plan all the shots, or the film makers try a little too hard make their films look like actual films. On the other hand, good cinematography is not always a bad thing, even in porn. You watch the porno film to get aroused, right? In this film you are treated to a lot of scenic views of landscapes, etc, and something which is lacking in a lot of films, a view of the ladies before they get undressed. All this enhances the arousal level. Not only that, the setup and composition of some of the shots is impressive. Sex against scenic background is a bit surreal. But, the porn film has to be about the sex, because porn actors are not usually very good actors, and the sex here has that jump cut feel.

Stars: Chrystal, Kristina Bella, Stella Virgin, CG, Panni, Alexi, Nick Lang, Steve Holmes. Directed by: Kovi I was in two minds about this feature. Initially i picked this up after having seen 'Dangerous things' and wanted to see more of Kristina Bella. This isn't the best private film, but the sex isn't bad and the girls range in sexiness. And then there's Steve Holmes... You see Private films have a way that the girls play to the camera in the sex scenes. It can be fun and sexy, especially during a facial as it has a close up, (and if the girl is especially hot, which is usually the case, then it's a real plus!). Under NO circumstances should a guy play to the camera!!!! I managed to ignore Steve Holmes in Sex Sliders, which is the point. The guys should be ignorable, without being too ugly or old etc. In fact, i don't mind when the guy is 'fit', as it keeps my girlfriend quiet! But the guy is never center stage really. As degrading as it sounds, a typical porno is usually a girl(s), cock(s), and a few sexual postions.